Marisa Conover, her mother, Death by Haldol and Shlomo Rechnitz

NURSINGHOME_0378

SHLOMO RECHNITZ AND HIS NURSING HOMES – MR. RECHNITZ, WOULD YOU TREAT YOUR MOTHER THE WAY YOUR PATIENTS ARE TREATED??

Lost Messiah, on behalf of Genine Zizzo and others, May 24, 2016

Genine Zizzo and Death by Haldol:

zizzoMarisa Conover’s mother, Genine Zizzo, entered a the Roosevelt Point nursing care system for what was to have been physical rehabilitation, nothing more. Ms. Conover gave specific instructions to the staff that her mother was not to be chemically restrained.  According to Ms. Conover and investigated by CBSNews (see link below), Zizzo was forcibly held down while she was injected with Haldol despite specific instructions to the contrary. As Ms. Conover tells the story:

“I’m reminded of who Shlomo Rechnitz is every time I visit my Mother’s grave! My petite, 82 year old Mother died in an irreversible vegetative state just days after being forcibly injected with the powerful and dangerous antipsychotic drug Haldol, against her will and against MY orders as her Durable and Medical Durable Power Of Attorney-In-Fact by an unscrupulous Nurse at Shomo Rechnitz’s Roseville Point Health and Wellness center outside of Sacramento, CA. She was only supposed to do a week of physical therapy rehab for a back sprain. My Mother is a featured victim in this ABC News10 Investigative Report on the inappropriate drugging of the Elderly (click on the second screen if you want to view the news story). I will NOT rest until those involved are arrested, charged, prosecuted, convicted and sent to State Prison for what they did to my Mother.”

http://www.abc10.com/news/investigations/chemical-restraints-anti-psychotic-meds-given-to-elderly-despite-warnings/181919144

 

THE USE OF HALDOL

According to a number of studies, Haldol is used fairly regularly in nursing homes to sedate patients. Federal law prohibits the use of antipsychotics and other psychoactive drugs for the convenience of staff. It’s called a “chemical restraint.” There has to be a documented medical need for the drugs.[NPR.ORG].  While many nursing home chains are guilty of this practice, the facilities in the Shlomo Rechnitz empire currently have the worst ratings. 

The black box warning on Haldol (haloperidol)  reads as follows:

WARNING

Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis

Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks), largely in patients taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, revealed a risk of death in drug-treated patients of between 1.6 to 1.7 times the risk of death in placebo-treated patients. Over the course of a typical 10-week controlled trial, the rate of death in drug-treated patients was about 4.5%, compared to a rate of about 2.6% in the placebo group. Although the causes of death were varied, most of the deaths appeared to be either cardiovascular (e.g., heart failure, sudden death) or infectious (e.g., pneumonia) in nature. Observational studies suggest that, similar to atypical antipsychotic drugs, treatment with conventional antipsychotic drugs may increase mortality. The extent to which the findings of increased mortality in observational studies may be attributed to the antipsychotic drug as opposed to some characteristic(s) of the patients is not clear. HALDOL Injection is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis (see WARNINGS).

In theory, one would think that it would be the medicine of last resort in psychotic, elderly people and would not be the pharmaceutical of first choice to sedate elderly patients. If the Haldol website it correct, it can kill those on whom it is most used. The black box warnings are a clear indication to a prescribing physician or nurse practitioner that the use of this drug is at his or her own peril.

http://www.abc10.com/news/investigations/chemical-restraints-anti-psychotic-meds-given-to-elderly-despite-warnings/181919144

ANOTHER WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT – Geneva Hilton:

Similar to the Genine Zizzo case, Czersale Hilton’s mother was admitted into Centinella Skilled Nursing & Wellness Center West in Inglewood in 2014. Five weeks later she was taken to the hospital suffering from pneumonia, dehydration and a body temperature of lower than 80 degrees. The doctors suspected elder neglect.  According to the from CBSNews.com, investigative reporter David Goldstein tallied $500 million in Medicare and Medi-Cal money. It was not until Goldstein entered one of the facilities with a hidden camera that the problems with the facility became clearer.  See the article from CBS that follows.

Largest Calif. nursing home chain accused of wrongful death

LOS ANGELES— The owner of California’s largest chain of nursing homes has come under fire, accused of abuse and wrongful deaths.

CBS Los Angeles reports the daughter of a resident of one of their nursing homes has filed a lawsuit, claiming her mother died prematurely as a result of the care she received.

Czersale Hilton’s mother, Geneva, 68, was admitted into Centinela Skilled Nursing & Wellness Centre West in Inglewood in 2014. Five weeks later, she was dead.

“I was shocked. Of course, I was shocked, because the last time I spoke to my mom, she was herself,” Hilton recalled. “I loved my mother with all my heart, and I miss her every day.”

Hilton has sued Centinela West, claiming elder abuse and negligence. According to the lawsuit, her mother “was admitted for rehabilitative care following a hospitalization for chest pains. Her lungs were clear and she was in good condition.”

But five weeks later, she was rushed to a hospital in critical condition, suffering from pneumonia, dehydration and a body temperature of lower than 80 degrees.

According to the lawsuit, doctors suspected elder neglect. “So, something went on there. I am still not clear on what happened over there,” Hilton said.

Goldstein visited Centinela West with a hidden camera. He witnessed a patient moaning, and his producer smelled human waste.

According to the most current 2015 Medicare nursing home profile, Centinela West has an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

But the nursing staffing and health inspection categories both got only 2 stars, something Medicare considers below average.

Centinela West is not the only nursing home with multiple complaints connected to Rechnitz.

“It was like zombies walking around here,” said South Pasadena police chief Art Miller, who described patients at South Pasadena Convalescent Hospital when it used to be owned by Rechnitz.

The federal government decertified it last year, denying its eligibility to get Medicare money. It happened after Courtney Cargill, 57, set herself on fire.

The FBI has also raided two of Rechnitz’s facilities, including the Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Center in Riverside. No charges have been filed.

The California attorney general filed involuntary manslaughter charges against the Verdugo Valley Skilled Nursing facility in Montrose and two staff supervisors after a 58-year-old male patient died.

The attorney general tried unsuccessfully to block Rechnitz from owning more nursing homes saying his “continued and repeated refusals to comply with industry laws and regulations was harming the skilled nursing industry.”

Patricia McGinnis with the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform asked: “If that’s the case, why are you giving out more licenses to this company?”

“Under his particular company, we’ve had more closures and more decertifications in such a short period of time than any time that I can think of in the last 30 years,” McGinnis added.

The California Department of Health, which licenses nursing homes, refused a request for an on-camera interview about Rechnitz’s facilities.

ADVOCATING NURSING CARE REFORM:

One in every 14 beds currently available in California is owned by Shlomo Rechnitz or one of his companies. He is the largest single provider of nursing care. He also has more violations then any other provider. It is true that many of the homes he acquired were already problematic when they merged into his empire. But, little has improved. His “philanthropic endeavors” apparently do not extend to the patients in his care.

CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM:

Unmasked: How California’s Largest Nursing Home Chains Perform


The Sacramento Bee published a groundbreaking series of articles this week on who owns California nursing homes and why it matters to people who need nursing home care. The sweeping three-part series by Marjie Lundstrom and Phillip Reese identifies and examines the performance of California’s 25 largest nursing home chains, exposes some of the people behind them and questions why they are so poorly regulated.

Part 1 is a data-driven examination of how the largest nursing home chains are performing. Using public data, the Sac Bee rated each of the 25 largest chains, giving lowest marks to the following: LifeHouse Health Services, EmpRes Healthcare Management LLC, Genesis HealthCare Corp., Mariner Health Care, and Brius Healthcare Services/Shlomo Rechnitz.
Read Part 1: Unmasked: How California’s Nursing Homes Perform

Part 2 examines the great lengths nursing home companies go to disguise what facilities they own and their business relationships. As part of its coverage, The Sac Bee launched a statewide database on California nursing homes that identifies which facilities are owned by chains and the name of the chain for each facility.
Read Part 2: Unmasked: Who Owns California Nursing Homes

Part 3 describes the Department of Public Health’s total failure to measure quality of care throughout a nursing home chain and to give complete and accurate information on nursing home ownership on its consumer information website. A Sac Bee editorial following the series summed up the situation: People who enforce the rules fail on the most basic level – helping people understand which chains operate safe and humane facilities, and which aren’t acceptable.
Read Part 3: California falls short in disclosing nursing-home ownership

Key findings:

  • Twenty-five for-profit nursing home chains control about half of the state’s 120,000 licensed nursing home beds;
  • Shlomo Rechnitz, California’s largest nursing home operator, has acquired nearly 75 nursing homes since 2004 – and is connected to 130 businesses tied to his nursing home chain –but neither Rechnitz nor his company, Brius Healthcare, appears anywhere in the Department of Public Health’s licensed facility listing report;
  • Ten of the largest chains in the state make it hard for consumers to see what facilities they own because they do not have websites or offer websites that lack specific facility information;
  • California nursing homes owned by Genesis HealthCare had seven times the state average of complaints of abuse in 2013;
  • Among California’s 10 largest chains, nine fell below state averages in three out of five key staffing measures in 2012;
  • Five chains control about one-fifth of the state’s nursing home beds: Brius/Rechnitz, Longwood Management, Plum Healthcare Group, Smedra/Winter and Windsor.
  • It has been virtually impossible for the public to take a nursing home chain’s performance into account when selecting a nursing home.

Sources:

Hughes, Rhidian. “Chemical restraint in nursing older people.” Nursing Older People Apr. 2008: 33+. Academic OneFile. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.

Kidder, Samuel W. “The Chemical Restraint Debate.” Geriatric Times 1 May 2002: 40. Academic OneFile. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.

Yu, Chieh-Chen, and Hui-Chi Huang. “Chemical Restraint and Nursing Care in the Intensive Care Unit. [Chinese].” Journal of Nursing 57.6 (2010): 83-88. CINAHL Plus with Full Text. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.

Sacramento Bee: June 13, 2015

California’s largest nursing home owner under fire from government regulators

At the top of the chain: Shlomo Rechnitz, a 43-year-old Los Angeles entrepreneur and philanthropist.

Since 2006, Rechnitz and his primary company, Brius Healthcare Services, have acquired 81 nursing homes up and down the state, many of them through bankruptcy court. His chain has grown so quickly that he now controls about 1 in every 14 nursing home beds in California, giving him an outsized influence on quality of care in the state.

In the past year, multiple alarms have been raised about this relative newcomer to the industry and the care provided in some of his homes. His facilities have become the target of police scrutiny, lawsuits, stiff regulatory fines and state and federal investigations that have uncovered numerous alleged violations.

Nine stories from Rechnitz’s California nursing homes

In 2013-14, these 23 nursing homes owned by Shlomo Rechnitz received a total of 50 serious deficiencies, or problematic conditions graded G or higher by the federal government.

Stories from some of those homes

Alameda Healthcare & Wellness Center

3 serious deficiencies

The facility got one of its serious deficiencies after a female resident lost more than 11 pounds in four months, or 13 percent of her body weight, and inspectors observed that she appeared “thin and frail.” The resident had told staff that the food was too dry and requested extra gravy because of her “swallowing disorder” that caused her to choke more easily. Inspectors found that the dietary aide failed to notify the cook, and the resident’s weight fell to 74.1 pounds.

Gridley Healthcare & Wellness Centre

6 serious deficiencies

Decertified effective Oct. 2 and set for closure. Surveyors identified immediate jeopardy to residents four times in five months. In the first survey, investigators said a patient suffered dehydration and died, while another resident with severe chest pain complained it took staff nine hours to get him an ambulance.

Oakhurst Healthcare & Wellness Centre

4 serious deficiencies

Inspectors issued multiple deficiencies after seven residents and one staff member fell ill from a contagious infection. Surveyors found poor hand-washing by staff, improper cleaning methods and unsanitary handling of linens. The director of staff development stated she had provided infection control training, but investigators found the documents had been taken from Wikipedia – “not recognized as a standard resource for professional infection control practice.”

Pacific Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Eureka

1 serious deficiency

All 57 residents were found to be in immediate jeopardy when inspectors discovered the facility was using seven portable space heaters in resident care areas. The building’s heating system had been malfunctioning during a cold snap, and space heaters were set on high, posing a fire risk. Inspectors found one space heater in the front lobby beneath a table, near a lighted artificial Christmas tree. Another was inside the nurses’ station between two racks of clinical records.

Presidio Health Care Center, Spring Valley

2 serious deficiencies

The facility got two serious deficiencies because of low food supplies. Inspectors found inadequate food stock to meet daily nutritional needs, or for an emergency. Two refrigerators at the facility contained only a plastic bag with a “grey colored substance” (identified by staff as five pounds of hamburger) and five gallons of milk. The third refrigerator was empty.

Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center

1 serious deficiency

A resident with “moderate dementia” and a “history of self-mutilating behavior” was burned in September 2012 after she helped herself to four cups of coffee in the lobby and spilled them into her lap. The coffee, left out for anyone, was later found to be more than 170 degrees. Inspectors determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for the disabled resident to prevent the injuries.

South Pasadena Convalescent Hospital

(Renamed Mission Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre)

2 serious deficiencies

Decertified effective Jan. 5. The facility got a serious deficiency after a 67-year-old female resident collapsed and died during an inspection. Investigators found that a licensed vocational nurse and certified nursing assistant did not know how to properly administer CPR, and 10 staff members did not respond correctly when asked later about CPR guidelines. The facility received a second serious deficiency after seven mentally ill patients were found to be coming and going without proper assessment. One committed suicide in a nearby neighborhood by lighting herself on fire.

Vernon Healthcare Center, Los Angeles

7 serious deficiencies

This facility had more serious violations in 2013 and 2014 than any other owned by Rechnitz. Key concerns were poor supervision, including one resident who used a motorized wheelchair twice found lying on the ground, injured, outside the facility. The administrator told inspectors that residents leave “all the time and just never return to the facility.” She said the nursing home does nothing to check on their welfare, assuming they “had just gone back to the streets.”

Wish-I-Ah Healthcare & Wellness Centre, Auberry

3 serious deficiencies

Decertified effective Nov. 7. Rechnitz permanently closed the facility late last year. Investigators visiting the home in October called immediate jeopardy in three instances and gave Wish-I-Ah its most severe deficiency for an infection that sickened residents and staff. Surveyors also issued a deficiency over the death of a 75-year-old resident from sepsis after improperly handling her wound dressing. They cited unsanitary conditions in the kitchen, bathrooms and ice machine, as well as improper disposal of raw sewage.

Owner California’s Biggest Nursing Home Chain Shlomo Rechnitz Accused Of Abuse, Neglect

The FBI has also raided two of Rechnitz’s facilities, including the Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Center in Riverside. No charges have been filed.

The California attorney general filed involuntary manslaughter charges against the Verdugo Valley Skilled Nursing facility in Montrose and two staff supervisors after a 58-year-old male patient died.

The attorney general tried unsuccessfully to block Rechnitz from owning more nursing homes saying his “continued and repeated refusals to comply with industry laws and regulations was harming the skilled nursing industry.”

Patricia McGinnis with the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform asked: “If that’s the case, why are you giving out more licenses to this company?”

“Under his particular company, we’ve had more closures and more decertifications in such a short period of time than any time that I can think of in the last 30 years,” McGinnis added.

The California Department of Health, which licenses nursing homes, refused a request for an on-camera interview about Rechnitz’s facilities.

After several requests for an on camera interview, a spokesperson for Rechnitz issued a statement: “Mr. Rechnitz has for years been an integral part of providing quality nursing home services to Californians, rescued 59 institutions from insolvency, preserved 6,000 jobs, provides life-aiding services to thousands of Californians.”

The spokesperson said Rechnitz has gone above and beyond what is necessary to deal with the challenges of the industry.

As for Hilton, she is still searching for answers and hopes telling her story will help others. “I didn’t want my mom’s death to be in vain.”

In response to the accusations, the company provided the following statement to CBS Los Angeles:

“No matter how much one sensationalizes a story with foreboding music, hidden cameras and scurrilous charges, the fact remains that Mr. Rechnitz has for years been an integral part of providing quality nursing home services to Californians throughout the state.

Regardless of the accusations of the rapacious plaintiffs bar, the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform and other special interests, the facts are clear:

Mr. Rechnitz has rescued 59 institutions from insolvency, resulting in the continuation of care for more than 6,000 patients and the maintenance of 6,000 jobs.

He currently provides life-aiding services to thousands of Californians; and

He has dealt with any challenges that these homes have faced by going above and beyond what is necessary to meet those challenges.

Any claims to the contrary ignore the facts in favor of the kind of salacious, cheap headlines that do little more than damage someone who is working tirelessly to help a population that is far too often underrepresented.”

See also:

VIDEOS:

Haysha Deitsch – HAVE YOU NO SHAME, NO SOUL?

Hopefully there is a special place in Hell Awaiting Haysha Deitsch…

Haysha.3b

Haysha Deitsch lost his Court plea to sell the long term assisted living property at One Prospect Park West because he claimed he could no longer afford the property (but of course this had nothing to do with the $75M he stood to gain if Sugar Hill Capital Partners acquired the property).

Now crying poverty (after buying two other buildings for upwards of $10Million in 2015), the five holdeouts, women ranging from ages between 91 and 101 years old are risking foreclosure of the property.

The families have reached out to Eric Shneiderman’s office for help. These are elderly people who deserve to live in peace. We admire them for their tenacity. They deserve better from the State of New York.

The NY Daily News:

Five elderly holdouts fight to stop B’klyn care facility closure – NY Daily News

EXCLUSIVE: Five elderly holdouts at Brooklyn assisted-living facility won’t back down from real estate developer

The residents — women between 91 and 101 years old — are all that stand between developer Haysha Deitsch and his plan for a new condo development.

Two years after the sale of Prospect Park Residence was announced, nearly all of the assisted-living facility’s 125 residents have long since heeded management’s orders to leave.

But five holdouts have refused, challenging the handling of the $76.5 million sale and sparking a web of litigation. Their fight is shining a spotlight on the plight of the elderly and their desire to live in dignity.

A Consorted Effort – The Braunstein Empire, the Zupnik Empire… A Healthcare Scheme…Scam…Sham??

nursing-2Healthcare, Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Businesses Web of Inter-Connected Entities

May 18, 2016

An investigation into the Healthcare, Rehabilitation Care and Nursing Care businesses has unraveled webs of inter-connected entities and huge finances. With regard to the Summit Park Hospital and Healthcare Facility, it would appear that Rockland County missed a poison dart by not accepting Allure Group/Allure Healthcare LLC as the acquiring party, evident in new reports regarding the principal in Allure, Joel Landau.

According to Freedom of Information Act requests, the parties that bid on the Summit Park Hospital and Healthcare Facility were:

  1. Allure Group – Allure Healthcare LLC (see articles associated with Allure)
  2. Summit Acquisition Group/ Summit Park Acquisition Group (Braunstein Entity)
  3. Sympaticare – Sympaticare Healthcare (Braunstein Entity)
  4. Northern Riverview Healthcare/Northern Services Group
  5. Bronx Rehabilitation Care/Center for Care LLC
  6. Focus Investment (Zupnik) (See article Associated to FBI Raids at 386 Route 59 in Airmont)

In the case of Summit Park, Sympaticare won the bid, but in actuality, Summit Acquisition Group won the bid as well because they are owned by the same principals. The way in which the Summit Park deal was supposed to unfold, had everything gone as planned, Sympaticare Acquisition Group, would have acquired the real property of the 50 Sanitorium Road, Pomona, New York facility. In the case of Summit Park, the application with the Public Health Planning Council of the State of New York stated “There is a relationship between Sympaticare, LLC and Summit Park Acquisition Group, LLC in that the entities have common membership. According to the Project #’s related to Summit Park, the Purchase and Sale Agreement, entered into on April 16, 2013 or thereabouts was between Sympaticare, LLC (the proposed operator of the residential healthcare facility) and Sympaticare Health, LLC (the proposed hospital operator). The deal was structured in such a way that the hospital operation component was to be subsequently assigned to Sympaticare, LLC and Summit Park Acquisition Group, LLC (who we already know is the proposed real property owner). Additionally Sympaticare, LLC was to have entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the real property interests in the actual facility.

It should be noted that ALL OF THESE ENTITIES ARE PART OF THE BRAUNSTEIN CONSORTIUM. So, whether or not the real property and tangible assets ever actually transferred title would not have mattered because the Braunsteins were interested parties in Sympaticare Acquisition Group and all of the conglomerated entities. The plan, and apparently not unusual, is that there was to have been a lease on the property, the Braunstein’s Sympaticare, LLC would be making payments to the Braunstein’s Acquisition Holdings LLC. Once final approvals were obtained, the lease was to be terminated and the property’s ownership transferred. If for some reason, that could not materialize, it would not really have had any financial implications on the Braunsteins.

Tax implications of the LLC’s notwithstanding, a structure like this represented a win/win for, in this example, the Braunsteins.

But, that’s not where it ends. In addition to ownership interests in the umbrella entity, Sympaticare Acquisition Group, the Braunsteins (and potentially other members of the investor group) also own a stake in or have licensing/service provider contracts with their service providers. They get everything from foodservice to ambulances to medicare/Medicaid collections, to hospital referrals (which are generally done (if done legally) by a numerical grading system) and the list goes on. In the case of Sympaticare, father and son Braunstein are the main principals but also have stakes in service-related entities.

Braunstein:

The Sympaticare deal: Shalom Braunstein was to have 35% and Barry Braunstein 10% making up 45% of Sympaticare, LLC, d/b/a Summit Park Hospital d/b/a Summit Nursing Care Facility. The remaining interests were spread across other “Sympaticare” entities like Sympaticare New Jersey, LLC and Sympaticare Lakewood, LLC, both of which had overlapping membership stakes.

The effort to buy Summit Park went south in September 2015; and since that time, Sully Braunstein has filed a lawsuit against the County for, amongst other things, a return of the deposit, claiming that the fault of the failure to close was not his.

Currently, according to an article dated December 11, 2015, Barry Braunstein (the father of the pair) is also looking to purchase a nursing facility in Red Hook, which is meeting with some community concerns, and with good reason. The name of the entity in that particular endeavor is Oxford Nursing Home. In an article in Cranes, dated December 11, 2015, entitled Nursing home’s $65 million Red Hook site gets community-board nod, while the community board apparently approved what is listed as a $65M Red Hook site, of greatest concern is the fact that the site is in a Flood Zone. That really should be the least of their concerns.

According to Cranes, “The nursing home would have a generator on-site in case residents need to remain in place, and it has worked out agreements with hospitals and other nursing homes to take on patients in the case of an evacuation. It also has a contract with an ambulance company to transport patients in an emergency.”  [http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20151211/REAL_ESTATE/151219958/nursing-homes-65-million-red-hook-site-gets-community-board-nod]

As mentioned above, the ambulance contract comes as no surprise. What would be a surprise is if the Braunsteins don’t have an interest in an ambulance company as part of the Oxford or another conglomerate of businesses associated with the Braunstein empire. Again, a win/win for the Braunsteins.

Unsurprising, the Braunsteins have their hands in the pockets of numerous elderly and infirmed (as distinguished from informed). Barry Braunstein’s LinkedIn profile lists him as administrator of the Laconia Nursing home (http://www.laconianursinghome.com/)  (https://www.linkedin.com/in/barry-braunstein-37942360). The NYS Health Profiles Website (http://profiles.health.ny.gov/nursing_home/view/150669) lists Laconia Nursing Home on 1050 East 230th Street in the Bronx. The government websites list the ownership of the Laconia as Laconia Nursing Home, as follows:

 

More to follow…

NURSING HOMES PART II – Corporate Ownership

justin.2.

Corporate ownership changes linked to poor nursing home quality

Director of Healthcare – Education (K-12) IT Solutions / Special Projects

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/corporate-ownership-changes-linked-poor-nursing-home-schwartz-mph

Ms. Emily Monogan, a staff writer, for Mcknights  (a Long-Term Care News pre-eminent magazine for long term care giving professionals) reports that; nursing homes that are bought and sold by corporate chains tend to provide a lower quality of care, according to research from Harvard Medical School released on Monday.

 Many nursing homes that experienced a chain-related transaction between 1993 and 2010 had a higher number of deficiency citations than facilities that did not undergo a transaction, according to researchers from Harvard, the University of Michigan, the University of Rochester and Vanderbilt University.

 In many instances, nursing homes that were the subject of a transaction were already having quality issues, which continued after the transaction. Those pre-existing quality issues led the researchers to believe that the transaction wasn’t to blame for any drops in quality, but rather that corporate transactions can be an indicator of a low-quality facility.

 The study’s results could spur policymakers to create legislation that requires more comprehensive reporting of ownership for nursing homes chains, as well as increased accountability, oversight and transparency for corporate chains, the researchers said. The researchers also suggest that notices of nursing home sales should be publicly available, an idea that was recently set as a rule in Massachusetts.

 The researchers noted that consumers may be able to use the number of a facility’s chain-related transactions as a potential indicator of a facility’s quality.

“A large number of mergers, sales and acquisitions have occurred over the past two decades among nursing home chains, and we wanted to see how residents living in these nursing homes were affected by these transactions,” explained lead researcher David Grabowski, Ph.D., a professor of healthcare policy at Harvard.

Each year, between 1,200 and 2,000 nursing homes in the United States — 7% to 13% of all facilities — are involved in a corporate chain transaction. Despite that, the amount of nursing homes owned by a corporate chain remains the same as it was in the 1990s, the study’s authors note.

 The most common type of transaction is mergers across chains, with eight of the 10 largest nursing homes chains — which comprise 12% of all facilities — undergoing some sort of ownership change within the study period.

Results of the study appear in the May issue of Health Affairs.

 

Nursing Home Evictions is the excuse to Drop Difficult Patients its nothing but to Human Dumping

NURSING HOME EVICTIONS

By Justin Schwartz, MPH – LinkedIn

Director of Healthcare – Education (K-12) IT Solutions / Special ProjectsJustin.1

 Sadly, it’s a term you may come to hear more often: ‘nursing home evictions.’ While it is true that nursing homes and chronic care facilities have the right to evict a resident for just cause—and those causes are generally limited to six—a trend has been growing where residents have been evicted more for reasons of convenience.

Or worse—because the facility thinks it can earn more revenue for the bed from a more well-heeled source.

“When they get tired of caring for the resident, they kick the resident out,” said Richard Mollot of the Long Term Care Community Coalition, a New York advocacy group. Complaints and lawsuits across the U.S. point to a spike in evictions even as observers note available records only give a glimpse of the problem.

An Associated Press analysis of federal data from the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program finds complaints about discharges and evictions are up about 57 percent since 2000. It was the top-reported grievance in 2014, with 11,331 such issues logged by ombudsmen, who work to resolve problems faced by residents of nursing homes, assisted living facilities and other adult-care settings.

The American Health Care Association, which represents nursing homes, defends the discharge process as lawful and necessary to remove residents who can’t be kept safe or who endanger the safety of others, and says processes are in place to ensure evictions aren’t done improperly. Dr. David Gifford, a senior vice president with the group, said a national policy discussion is necessary because there are a growing number of individuals with complex, difficult-to-manage cases who outpace the current model of what a nursing home offers.

“There are times these individuals can’t be managed or they require so much staff attention to manage them that the other residents are endangered,” he said.

The numbers of both nursing homes and residents in the U.S. have decreased in recent years; about 1.4 million people occupy about 15,600 homes now. The overall number of complaints across a spectrum of issues has fallen in the past decade, though complaints about evictions are down only slightly from their high-water mark in 2007, the federal figures show. Meanwhile, the share of complaints that evictions and discharges represent has steadily grown, holding the top spot since 2010.

Offending facilities routinely flout federal law, attempting to exploit and widen justifications for discharge. They say hospitalizations are a common time when facilities seek to purge residents, even though the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 guarantees Medicaid recipients’ beds must be held in their nursing homes during hospital stays of up to a week.

“They try and take the easy way out and refuse to let the person back in,” said Eric Carlson, an attorney who has contested evictions for the advocacy group Justice in Aging.

Federal law allows unrequested transfers of residents for a handful of reasons: the facility’s closure; failure to pay; risk posed to the health and safety of others; improvement in the resident’s condition to the point of no longer needing the home’s services; or because the facility can no longer meet the person’s needs.

Though that final category is often cited in evictions, advocates dispute how often it fits.

“The majority of the time, it’s because the resident is considered difficult,” said Tony Chicotel, an attorney for California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform. Chicotel says involuntary discharges are almost entirely focused on Medicaid beneficiaries and that economics sometimes play a role in the ousters. Rather than a long-term Medicaid patient, many facilities would prefer to fill a bed with a private-pay resident or a short-term rehabilitation patient, whose care typically brings a far higher reimbursement rate under Medicare.

Red Hook, Flood Zones, The Braunstein Family Affairs…

More About the Braunstein Healthcare Empire, Medicaid and…. David Greenfield – the guy who gets to oversee zoning

Thank you to our contributors. We did our best to edit as little as possible on this. May 10, 2016
LM has reported on the Braunsteins several times. The father and son pair can be found in Ramapo, New York, and in Red Hook, Brooklyn, just to name a few. But wherever they are, scandal is not far behind.
In Red Hook, papa Braunstein is attempting to relocate his Oxford Nursing Home from a  hot real estate neighborhood in Ft Greene Brooklyn (where he can turn a huge profit or create expensive housing) to Red Hook where there have been numerous protests within the community. However, what is not being considered is permitting Braunstein to be the steward of old people in a storm surge evacuation facility!!
Braunstein is, as far as we can tell, a despicable owner/operator of numerous healthcare facilities who, not only potentially defrauds the Medicaid system; but keeps his patents heavily sedated – more than most facilities. In some cases, they are arguably so drugged that the Braunstein team can keep payroll for aides low.
Just think: if the patients are largely comatose, there is little need for people to watch over them.
And from what we can see, while Borough President Adams seemed to “get it”. We are skeptical regarding David Greenfield, the Chair of the Land Use Committee of the City Council who will undoubtedly be the flack to rezone the Red Hook location to accommodate his comrades.

Rewind to an old New York Times Article, little has changed since:

“Consider three homes in the Bronx. The operator of the Laconia Nursing Home, which receives 90 percent of its revenues from Medicaid, earned $3 million in salary and profit. At the Grand Manor Nursing Home, also 90 percent financed by Medicaid, the operator and three family members earned a total of $2.4 million in salaries and profit. The owner and operator of the Morris Park home, 75 percent financed by Medicaid, took in $1.5 million in salary and profit.

Advocates for nursing home residents acknowledge that the homes’ operators and executives are entitled to make decent profits and salaries. But the advocates insist that it is unseemly for the profits and salaries to reach such high levels, given what the advocates contend is the industry’s longstanding record of poor care. They point out that at New York nursing homes, the staffing levels are lower than the national average, a crucial indicator. All three of the Bronx homes have staffing levels lower than the national average, according to federal statistics.

“It’s unconscionable to give yourself high salaries and not give some more money to hire people so some of these quality problems can be dealt with,” said Cynthia Rudder, executive director of the Long Term Care Community Coalition, an advocacy group for nursing home residents.

Trade groups representing nursing homes counter that most homes in the state are actually in financial distress because Medicaid does not pay enough.

Many hospital executives in New York also receive high salaries, but hospitals earn significant revenues from sources other than government social programs, including H.M.O.’s and private insurance. The 550 public, private and nonprofit nursing homes around the state, by contrast, earn more than two-thirds of their revenues from Medicaid, taking in roughly $6 billion last year from the program, according to state records. Many clinics receive most of their revenues from Medicaid as well.

Morris Berkowitz, operator of the Morris Park home, said he deserved his profits because he worked long hours and provided excellent care.

“Do you know how much I have invested in this place?” he said. “A lot of money. And I am constantly investing in this place.”

Earlier this year, after residents repeatedly wandered from Morris Park, federal and state officials accused the home of grievously poor supervision, and it was fined $86,000.

Mr. Berkowitz said the home had done nothing wrong. “It was a political thing, and we got caught up in it,” he said. “People with power, they abuse their power.”

Martin Liebman, operator of Grand Manor, said it was misleading to focus on salaries and profits.

“This is a family-owned business,” said Mr. Liebman, an officer of the state trade group of private nursing homes. “I’m third generation in the business. We have taken care of thousands of residents and given quality care for many, many years.”

Barry Braunstein, operator of the Laconia home, did not respond to three calls seeking comment.

Besides their high salaries, some executives profiting from Medicaid were also taking part in another tradition: cheating the program.”

Fast forward to an op-ed comment we received from one of our contributors:

“While I understand the aesthetic and contextual objections to the proposed 200 bed rezoning to accommodate a would-be Nursing Home…I’d like to also point out that the current operator/owner of the facility in Ft Greene has been a poor steward of his patients: Conover King Realty LLC aka Motechin. An in-depth review of the questionable standards of care deserve “equal time”…!
There’s a moral and ethical question which must part of the conversation. Why and how can the City [Greenfield] give a for-profit business special dispensation by rezoning community property on behalf of those who feel no compunction about over-medicating and sedating the elders who at their mercy? It’s just not good enough to say because there is a real need for more long term care and nursing facilities, that it’s perfectly okay to make a ‘pact with the devil’…The owner will make a tidy profit from the sale of his South Oxford facility…this neighborhood is the wild west of property churning…his avowals of a Red Hook nursing facility will be the precursor to market rate housing…I’m willing to bet the farm…Do not be fooled…his interest has nothing to do with providing seniors with a “more modern facility”…

Here’s a reference to the dismaying history of this nursing home and its owner/manager…some history on one of the owners.  Please note this from Norman Motechin -the Oxford Administrator in an article in the Gotham Gazette in Feb 2013-an excerpt:
More than half of the 205 residents at Oxford Nursing Home in Brooklyn were administered the potent drugs. Oxford’s administrator, Norman Motechin, said he was not familiar with the numbers and declined to discuss them.”  
Multiply this by who knows how many…and understand that too often these places where we send our loved ones are only holding sites for would-be developers…These “operators” suck up Medicare and Medicaid and keep their charges over medicated…understaffed…and immorally un-cared for.  
Red Hook…please…it may well be about property…but even more, it’s about the sub rosa oblivion we in the community have about our responsibility to care for our family members and our neighbors with some ethical concern!
  

 As we age…we are next…
Attention MUST BE PAID to the perpetuation of assisted living senior residences as well as “nursing homes” by real estate interests masquerading as administrators of care for the vulnerable. The churning of property is at the expense of the fragile and weak who cannot speak for themselves and who are additionally victimized by an oblivious NY State Department of Health and removed Federal oversight and… it’s repugnant.  
The city agencies MUST NOT abet via MIH, rezoning, subsidies or programs of that ilk, bad actors. Authenticity and an examination of track records must be mandatory first, if we are to protect fragile seniors from predatory greed.
 
Before privileges are given integrity MUST be verified.

Nursing Homes – “Alluring” Business – Political Contributions

Bottom Left – Allure Marketing Group from Allure website, Bottom Right, Shalom Braunstein

The High Finance of the Nursing Home Business and the People Who Profit at the Expense of the Elderly-Part I.

 

Contributors – May 8, 2016

Following the articles we did on Joel Landau and Allure, we received a series of emails providing us with additional information including numerous LLC’s registered at similar addresses as those of several nursing homes. We received information on nursing homes with horrendous reviews but profitable business models. We received a multitude of documents and emails regarding the high stakes game of the nursing home business.

We will be publishing this in pieces. We will begin with a letter from one contributor and Allure, Joel Landau and his partners, think Rivington

 

Dear LM,

I’ve been on a personal mission to counter the dismaying government sponsorship of harm to the disabled elderly in assisted living residences as well as nursing homes in NY. The revolving door of predatory property owners masquerading as long term care operators keeps me at it… Apropos of the much appreciated investigation by Comptroller Stringer of the mishandling of the Rivington Nursing Home property churn, I did some more investigation of the Allure Group . There are any number of malefactors…but sadly & as a Jew, I’ve seen the enabling of mostly Hasidic property owners masquerading as long term care operators by the either ignorant OR co-opted Dept of Health and the bought and paid for legislators who write impotent legislation-and who allow insufficient vetting and end up certifying the worst owners of these places. 

I want both the Department of Health and Governor Cuomo to be held to account. I want both the Aging and Health Committees in Albany to be accountable to the vulnerable aging-an enormously growing part of our population. These vulnerable elders are the DOH’s obligation to protect-and not their campaign contributors via the nursing home lobby group Leading Age/Hinman Straub who pay to play.

The churning of the homes of the frail and frightened must stop. It is another moral imperative as is the outrageous abuse of children. Jackals must be stopped…and certainly when they call themselves Jews-we must, as you are doing, call them out.

 

LM Note:

Some of the many names:

joel-landauallure

The mysterious partners who bamboozled city into luxury condo deal
The obscure Brooklyn company at the center of a City Hall scandal already owed millions of dollars in unpaid tax and Joel Landau

http://forward.com/news/national/337575/hasidic-businessman-who-flipped-aids-home-part-of-sect-with-cozy-ties-to-ma/

The New York State Department of Health continued to allow this group to flourish. The City Agency (DCAS) has a cavalier attitude towards the most vulnerable. DCAS ended up sponsoring the diminution of a long term care facility even as the Mayor promoted his Zoning for Quality and Affordability initiative which purports to incentivize developers to build more residences for the aged and infirm.

capaline

New York Post: Lobbyist James Capalino arranged for a DCAS restriction to be waived, allowing a nursing home

Allure Group-Joel Landau. Solomon Rubin… Marvin Rubin owners:

NYC Nursing Homes:
Hamilton Park Nursing
Linden Center for Nursing
Hopkins Center for Nursing
King David Center for Nursing
Crown Hts Center for Nursing
Bedford Center for Nursing
Harlem Center for Nursing
(Grandell Rehab-Solomon Rubin –CFO)
(Beach Terrace Care Solomon Rubin –CFO)
St Joachim and Anne Nursing
Nostrand Center for Nursing and Rehab aka NNRC Properties LLC (formerly CABS Nursing)…bought by Allure for $15,600,000 & now being converted into condos in Bed-Stuy, Brklyn

NJ:
Norwood Terrace Health Center

Landau is owner of :
InteliMed
E-Z Bill Inc
Care to Care LLC
199 Lee Ave Suite 182
Brooklyn, NY 11211

Landau is also Chairman of AlphaCare of New York
http://ir.magellanhealth.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=784883
Landau is Managing Director Co-owner of Pinta Partners

Rubin(s) also owners of :
Community care EMS LLC:
http://www.nycremsco.org/images/formsandapplications/

REDACTED%20Index%20and%20exhibits%20A%20(3777)%20and%20B%20(3778s).pdf

The following includes reviews from families of loved ones impacted by sub-par oversight and failure by the DOH to report/enforce and prevent more acquisitions by Allure Group…Landau and the Rubins

1) Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
(formerly Victory Memorial Hospital)

691 92nd St
Brooklyn, NY 11218
718 567 1000
Reviews:
http://www.yelp.com/biz/hamilton-park-nursing-and-rehabilitation-center-brooklyn

12/2/2015-Jessica F.
“This place deserves to be shut down as the operation is still a disgrace. For affected families, I urge you to let your voice be heard so families don’t suffer the consequences of keeping a loved one here. This place will just bill insurance and drain your bank account for little to no services rendered.”

2/13/2015
“Please do not send your loved ones here! The staff is negligent and administration is by far subpar. They will not report status updates about the well-fare of their residents and nurses are extremely rude, (watch out for Miriam!). I have witnessed three deaths in the unit in the course of three weeks and have seen the staff run codes. I’m a physician with a loved one who needed care and they literally drag their feet during emergency situations. Respiratory therapy does not suction patients regularly either and aids will throw family out of the room when they need to move the patient. Tactless and disrespectful and no professionalism training among the staff. This place may be up and running today, but it should not be operating in a developed society. Deserves to be investigated. I would give it no stars. Sad place, really. “

7/24/2015-Nancella R.
“WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING:
DO NOT PLACE A LOVED ONE IN HAMILTON PARK NURSING & REHAB CENTER UNLESS YOU WANT THEM TO DIE!!! Hamilton Park has a beautiful facade, but don’t let that fool you, they are criminally negligent! This place is truly a place you leave someone to die.

My mother-in-law was in there for 3 weeks (as a rehab patient) and they did as little as possible. They didn’t respond to calls for help, knowingly left stained sheets with feces on the floor and I actually have pictures. I witnessed them ignore cries for help… The PT was a joke. The staff was nonexistent, the administration is incompetent! PT gave her 30 minute “phone-in” sessions which basically reversed all the progress she made in Acute Care over at Methodist. She was supposed to have daily MD visits, that didn’t happen. Hamilton Park actually didn’t give her vital medicines prescribed to her by her neurologist at Mt. Sinai and they charged our insurance company for services that were never rendered. If it hadn’t been for my father-in-law never leaving her side, I seriously think they would have left her to die.

To make matters worse…. Upon release Hamilton Park’s social worker, Lana, promised care as per her discharge orders from a doctor she met only a few times. One paper, the orders looked good, but in reality there was no fulfillment of their orders. Hamilton Park contracts home care through a sham company names Arch HealthCare and their subsidiary Empire Home Health Care Services. They didn’t provide any of the care she was promised. For 2 weeks, she was left to rot at home. They provided zero advocacy. Once it became obvious, we would receive no care, our family stepped in and took the bums off the case. Now (VNS) Visiting Nurse Services is managing her care at home. BTW, I highly recommended VNS!

WARNING: Stay clear away from Hamilton Park Nursing Home, Arch Home Health Care and Empire Home Healthcare Services!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They are criminally negligent and my family is in the midst of filing a lawsuit! DO NOT SEND ANYONE THERE!!!

Whoever has the audacity to write a good review for this place must be sadistic and they must work there. Seriously, shame shame shame!!!!

If I could rate this facility with less than one star, I would. “

2) Linden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation (formerly Ruby Weston Manor)

2237 Linden Blvd
Brooklyn, New York 11207
Review:

http://local-nursing-homes.com/nursing-homes-reviews/new-york/kings-county

Dec 24, 2015 “One star is one star too many for this facility. My computer won’t allow zero stars to be processed. The staff needs to be completely retrained in the nursing and nurses aides programs. The neglect and unprofessionalism is disgusting. This place should be under strict scrutiny and be completely re-staffed with caring professionals that know how to do their job! In reference to L. Garcia.Thankfully he became so much more sick in there when he entered, he had to go to the hospital. He was saved. Imagine that!!!!!!!”

 

3) Hopkins Center for Nursing

155 Dean St
Brooklyn, NY 11217

Reviews:
http://www.yelp.com/biz/hopkins-center-for-rehabilitation-and-healthcare-brooklyn-2

3/26/2016 

-Lavitta C. “This place needs to be re-vamped. Everytime my relative would go out to hospital. No one knew which hospital, if she was back and good luck getting anyone the phone on the actual units. It smells terrible, like urine and feces. Patients are just there. no one returns phone calls! I would not recommend this place

3/10/2015 


 -Ellen J. 
Watch out for this place. Since the new owner assumed responsibility for this nursing home (previously run as Bishop Mugavero run by the Catholic church), they have been spending more money on redecorating than adequately trained staff. They constantly have too few staff during the evenings, weekends and holidays. Hallways smell of urine or feces. The disposable underwear of residents are not changes as often as they should. I am also very worried whether an appropriate evacuation could be handled in case of fire. They only have 3 slow moving elevators and door for gate in garden is locked.”

http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/health/4846-part-timer-harbors-troubling-memories-of-brooklyn-nursing-home

Hopkins property location on Dean St–per ACRIS- is owned by KFG Operating I LLC /Hopkins Ventures LLC (Marvin Rubin is 30% owner) located at 141-16 72nd Ave Flushing,

NY where the following LLCs are also located:
LOCATED at 141-16 72nd Ave…Flushing, NY

https://www.bizydex.com/new-york/flushing/141-16-72nd-avenue

CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
WESTCHESTER ALP PROPERTY LLC
BELLHAVEN VENTURES LLC
BELLHAVEN PROPERTY LLC
CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
STAFFDIRECTOR LLC
APPROVED STAFFING LLC
682 PELHAM ROAD LLC
680 PELHAM ROAD LLC
KFG RECEIVER LLC
KFG OPERATING I LLC
HOPKINS RECEIVER LLC
KFG OPERATING TWO LLC
KFG LAND TWO LLC
KFG LAND I LLC
HOPKINS VENTURES LLC
APPROVED RESTORATION CONTRACTING LLC
CLOVER LAKE MANAGEMENT LLC
CLOVER LHCSA MANAGEMENT LLC
WESTCHESTER LHCSA MANAGEMENT LLC
SMITHTOWN HEALTH CARE PROPERTY LLC

King david

4) King David Center for Nursing (was Sephardic Nursing and Rehab)

2266 Cropsey Ave
Brooklyn NY 11214
Review:

https://npidb.org/organizations/nursing_and_custodial_care/skilled-nursing-facility_314000000x/1841613163.aspx

11/29/2015 – by SANDY for SGRNC LLC
 “Staffing on each floor has been more than cut in half. Today my mother was given a pastrami sandwich which was green molded. Only 2 doctors are in house and only twice a week so at most times there are no doctors available to see patients. Patients are now sent to the ER for minor complaints such as a fever. When it was the Sephardic Home there were many more nurses and aides. The quality of care is very poor.”