Joel Landau – Have You no Shame? An Allure of Disgust – but no photo of your face!

 

allure without landau

THE REAL DEAL

Allure demands lender pay $40M for Brooklyn nursing home

Joel Landau’s firm and Sabre Group are fighting over terms of loan default

March 06, 2017 01:40PM
By Kathryn Brenzel

The Allure Group fired back against a lawsuit filed by its lender on a Brooklyn nursing home, claiming that the financial firm should pay $40 million for the property.

 

Allure, headed by Joel Landau, claims that the Sabre Group must pay $40 million for 270 Nostrand Avenue and an additional $6 million because the sale of the property didn’t close on time, according to documents filed in state Supreme Court. Allure, one of the developers at the center of the Rivington House scandal, maintains that “the express and unambiguous provisions” of the mortgage it received from Sabre require the Midtown firm to pay $40 million for the property.

A spokesperson for Sabre would only say that Allure has “been in default for quite some time and that’s why we’re pursuing our claims.”

Sabre sued Allure in December, accusing the company of failing to repay a $20 million loan it provided to acquire the Brooklyn nursing home. Allure purchased CABS Nursing Home in Bedford-Stuyvesant in 2015 for $15.5 million. Sabre claims that, under the terms of the mortgage, it can purchase the nursing home for $25 million because Allure defaulted.

But Allure alleges that because the property was vacant and had no pending litigation at the time that Sabr tried to act on its purchase right, the lender is on the hook for higher purchasing price. The landlord also claims that a liquidated damages provision in the mortgage requires Sabr to put $6 million toward the outstanding balance on its loan, since the financial firm failed to acquire the property after Allure repeatedly scheduled closing dates.

Landau declined to comment.

In December, the city admitted that it did not have a legal case against Allure, despite Mayor Bill de Blasio’s promise to sue the company for flipping 45 Rivington Street. Allure made $72 million when it sold the property to Slate Property Group. In April, New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman issued subpoenas after Allure filed demolition plans for the Nostrand property, with the intention of replacing it with a seven-story, 241-unit rental building.

The nursing home filed a lawsuit against Allure in December claiming the company marketed itself as a nursing home business while bidding for the property and instead forced residents out. The lawsuit also notes that the property flip may have led to the deaths of a few nursing home residents, who they say were forced out.

Joel Landau -The Allure of Escaping Millions Richer – Sorry… No Pictures Please

rivington house

Dear Reader:

Joel Landau, through a series of demands and other bullying tactics sent in the form of threatening letters from Wordpress, claimed an array of Copyright violations. The poor little man did not like having his face on our pages. So he had his pictures forcibly removed from our pages and our archives with threat of shutting us down for Copyright Violations. While that makes us kinda want to put a Metadata link to his name and Allure Group on every single one of our pages, so that he and Allure will forever be synonymous with every ill, morally bankrupt and skewed activity referenced on these pages (particularly where healthcare facilities are concerned), we figured that would simply be unproductive. Instead, we are going to publish every article about Landau and Allure. We will publish every piece of information available. Just send it over. We hope that one day someone, more clever than him and his band of merry loophole-finders, figures out a way to make him pay for his reprehensible though remarkably clever behavior. He is another person who manipulates the lives of our most vulnerable citizens for ill-gotten gains. To Joel Landau and Shlomo Rechnitz – L’chaim…

http://therealdeal.com/2016/12/30/city-admits-it-doesnt-have-a-legal-case-against-allure-group-over-rivington-house/

City admits it doesn’t have a legal case against Allure Group over Rivington House

Mayor said law department can’t find “pathway” to seeking restitution from Joel Landau’s firm

The city’s hands may be tied when it comes to seeking restitution for the controversial sale of a Manhattan nursing home to a luxury condo developer.

Mayor Bill de Blasio, who in April vowed to sue Allure Group for flipping the property at 45 Rivington Street, said Thursday that the city’s lawyers “cannot find an actual pathway” to restitution.

“I support anything that would get us further restitution for what happened,” the mayor said at a press conference, Politico reported. “I made very clear my anger at the way the private-sector firm handled things,” he said. However, “So far, our law department cannot find an actual pathway.”

Allure made $72 million when it sold 45 Rivington to Slate Property Group, after convincing the city to lift a deed restriction on the site. The de Blasio administration maintained that Allure did not tell the city it intended to sell the building to a developer while negotiations were taking place. But a report from the Department of Investigations found that reps for Allure told the city in March 2015 that if the deed weren’t lifted, it would consider a conversion of the property to luxury apartments.

Comptroller Scott Stringer also accused Allure of misleading City Hall, but mostly faulted the de Blasio administration for mishandling information at virtually every turn. Allure maintains it did nothing wrong.

The mayor has insisted he was not aware of the deal.

Allure, led by Joel Launda, has maintained it did not lie to the city, but earlier this month, the mayor signed a bill to increase oversight of deed restrictions.

Meanwhile, the city hired two law firms this year to represent it in the Rivington deal, and in campaign finance investigations. The contracts are for more than $10 million, Politico reported. [Politico]E.B. Solomont

What if All non-Hasidic Moved out of New York State? Who Would Pay for Services? Where would the Taxes Come From?

Yeshiva-2
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/investigations/Religious-Schools-Homes-Ramapo-New-York-Rockland-County–402288745.html

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/investigations/Religious-Schools-Homes-Ramapo-New-York-Rockland-County–402288745.html

I-Team: Homes in NY Town Taken Over for Religious Schooling, Residents Say

Residents in the Rockland County town of Ramapo claim town officials are allowing single-family homes on small residential lots to be turned into religious schools with little or no public notice.

Suffern resident Annette Doerr said she has been battling the conversion of a home next door into an ultra-Orthodox school for several years. Doerr told the I-Team she believes there are more than 200 students in the four-bedroom house but has been unable to get specific information.

“It’s six days a week,” she said. “Whenever they’re on recess, we can’t be outside.”

“It’s too dangerous, it’s too dense,” she added. “The home was meant for a family.”

The property manager declined to tell the I-Team how many students attend the school.

Minna Greenbaum, another Suffern resident, said there are areas where almost every property on a block is a school or religious institution.

“The town turns a blind eye,” she said. “Everything is allowed.”

Residents said they are not opposed to schools if there is sufficient property to accommodate the students and buses safely.

Resident Peter Katz recently filed a lawsuit over a school that’s being developed on a nearby lot.

“A friend of mine owned this house, sold it to someone, and the very next thing, I discovered by accident it’s being converted to a school,” Katz said. “There was no public notice.”

Members of the Spring Valley Fire Department, which responds to emergency calls in the town of Ramapo, said they are especially concerned about modular trailers being moved onto residential lots as classrooms to accommodate students.

“We don’t even get the fire plans, and that’s the biggest thing,” said Captain Justin Schwartz. “It gets approved without us saying so. It’s a crime.”

The town of Ramapo passed a law limiting the use of “temporary” trailers to a maximum of two years. Democratic Assemblyman Ken Zebrowski said town officials have allowed the proliferation of “permanent” trailers to be used without proper enforcement.

He said he believes the New York Department of State should take over Ramapo’s building department.

“This is a willful, systemic ignoring of the law by those that are in charge, and when you have that, the State needs to step in,” he said.

Michael Klein, attorney for the town of Ramapo, told the I-Team that schools with permits are safe.

“The town of Ramapo will not issue a permission of occupancy permitting property to be used as a school unless it meets all fire and building codes,” he said.

“Whether people like the growing size of the community and the need to address the growing population, that’s a quality of life issue and people have different views of that,” he added.

Census figures for 2015 to 2016 showed there are 24,000 non-public school students in the East Ramapo school district and 8,500 public school students.

Ramapo Residents Make a Stand Against Ramapo Temporary School Law – Setting a Precedent!!!!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Ramapo Residents Fight Back Against

Ramapo Temporary School Law For Very First Time

Suffern, NY – November 7, 2016 – On June 22, 2016, Tony Mallia, Director of Building, Planning and Zoning for the Town of Ramapo, illegally issued a permit to Aron Bineth / Congregation Yeshiva Zera Yakov to allow for the conversion of a single family home at 101 Carlton Road West to a Yeshiva for 75 students. Mr. Mallia granted this permit over the objections of other Town and local fire officials who pointed out that this conversion was not legal under the Town of Ramapo Code, and who identified many health and safety issues in establishing such a project on an undersized residential lot. This permit, granted in violation of State and local law without planning board review, public hearings, or CDRC review meeting, was challenged by Local Resident Peter Katz in formal letters to the Town Board and Building Inspector. After receiving no response from the Town, Katz formally appealed to the Ramapo Zoning Board of Appeals. Katz had no choice but to petition the Supreme Court of Rockland County today to intercede, as the Ramapo ZBA approved a request by the Yeshiva’s owner/operators to adjourn the hearing of this important case while the construction continues upon the site at a breakneck pace.

The Verified Complaint filed today (Index No. 034819/2016) sets forth ten (10) causes of action, asking the Court to revoke this illegal building permit and to stop all work at the property, until same can be conducted in full compliance with State and local law.

Mr. Katz is joined by two other residents who also live within 500 feet of the property, Jack Gross and Sharon Kronenberg. All three of these Monsey/Suffern area residents are observant orthodox Jews who have sought out and obtained permission from their Rabbi to pursue this action against the Town of Ramapo.

The misuse and abuse of the Temporary Modular School Law under which this permit was approved has caused extreme divisiveness in Ramapo, particularly in the lower density residential neighborhoods of Western Ramapo. Properties housing these “temporary” schools often do not meet zoning code requirements and rely on the much too easy granting of substantial zoning variances by the ZBA. Most egregiously, as is the case in this new litigation, these projects are considered and approved without any form of public hearing as required under the law. Although these schools are supposedly only given temporary permits for one year, with a potential renewal for only one more year, the history of these projects demonstrates a complete lack of code enforcement by the Town of Ramapo. Once a “temporary school” is permitted, it remains open indefinitely.

These plaintiffs are not, of course, opposed to religious schools in their neighborhood. They are however, opposed to the pattern of disregarding the very laws which were established to protect the character of their neighborhood, to ensure the health, safety, and comfort of its inhabitants, and to ensure that their voices, and not just only the voices of developers, are heard.

# # #

Contact:

Peter Katz Phone – 845.357.0129

peterkatz99@gmail.com

 

LEGAL Filings:

Filing User Information

User Name:   STEVEN MOGEL Phone Number:   Fax Number:   Email Service Address:  smogel@sullivancountylawyers.com Work Address:

Payment Information

Amount of payment:  $210 Date of payment:  11/07/2016 Payment method:  VISA/MC Authorization code:  07240G Payment Comments:

E-mail Service Notifications Sent
Name Email Address
STEVEN MOGEL smogel@sullivancountylawyers.com
Note: Service of initiating documents and the “Notice of Availability Regarding Electronic Filing” (in consensual cases) or the “Notice of Commencement of Mandatory E-Filed Case” (in mandatory cases) must be made in hard copy (unless the party agrees to accept service by electronic means). These forms can be found on the NYSCEF site under the “Forms” menu. The served copies also must bear the assigned Index Number and the date of filing (CPLR 305).
Documents Filed

(To view a document, click the document type link)

Doc # Document Type Additional Doc Info Special Instructions Filed Date
1 SUMMONS + COMPLAINT
2 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 5/5/16 CDRC Application & 4/4/16 Narrative
3 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of the sections of the Code
4 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of Town of Ramapo Zoning Code
5 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 5/18/16 CDRC Memorandum
6 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 5/23/16 Mallia Memorandum
7 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of Lepori and Picarello Memoranda
8 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of Moran Memorandum
9 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of RCSD Memorandum
10 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of Tallman Fire Memorandum
11 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 6/1/16 CDRC agenda
12 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 6/22/16 Permit Application & 6/22/16 Building Permit
13 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of ZBA Appeal
14 EXHIBIT(S) 10/27/16 ZBA Agenda & Correspondence
15 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of 9/1/16 & 9/16/16 Shapiro Correspondence
16 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of cited sections of 2010 NYS Building Code & NYS Residential Code
THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE NAMED ADDRESSEE(S) AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE NEW YORK STATE COURTS ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM. IF YOU ARE NEITHER THE INTENDED RECIPIENT NOR A PERSON DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE MESSAGES ON BEHALF OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.
Rockland County Supreme Court Notification 11/07/2016

Please retain this notification for your records.
The NYSCEF web site has received documents from the filing user, STEVEN MOGEL , for the following case/claim.

 

Case Information

Index #:  034819/2016 Short Caption:  PETER KATZ et al – v. – YAKOV J. OSTREICHER et al Assigned Case Judge:  No Judge Assigned

Filing User Information

User Name:   STEVEN MOGEL Phone Number:   Fax Number:   Email Service Address:  smogel@sullivancountylawyers.com Work Address:

Documents Filed

(To view a document, click the document type link)

Doc # Document Type Additional Doc Info Special Instructions Filed Date
17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ( PROPOSED )   Relief Sought: Injunction/Restraining Order 11/07/2016
18 AFFIRMATION 11/07/2016
19 AFFIRMATION 11/07/2016
20 AFFIRMATION 11/07/2016
21 AFFIRMATION 11/07/2016
22 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of 5/5/16 CDRC Application & 4/4/16 Narrative Exhibit #: 1 11/07/2016
23 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of the sections of the Code Exhibit #: 2 11/07/2016
24 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the Town of Ramapo Zoning Code Exhibit #: 3 11/07/2016
25 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the 5/18/16 CDRC Memorandum Exhibit #: 4 11/07/2016
26 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of the 5/23/16 Mallia Memoranda Exhibit #: 5 11/07/2016
27 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of the Lepori & Picarello Memoranda Exhibit #: 6 11/07/2016
28 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the Moran Memorandum Exhibit #: 7 11/07/2016
29 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the RCSD Memorandum Exhibit #: 8 11/07/2016
30 EXHIBIT(S) Copies of the Tallman Fire Memorandum Exhibit #: 9 11/07/2016
31 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the 6/1/16 CDRC agenda Exhibit #: 10 11/07/2016
32 EXHIBIT(S) 6/22/16 Permit Application & 6/22/16 Buiding Permit Exhibit #: 11 11/07/2016
33 EXHIBIT(S) Copy of the ZBA Appeal Exhibit #: 12 11/07/2016
34 EXHIBIT(S) 10/27/16 ZBA Agenda & Correspondence Exhibit #: 13 11/07/2016
35 EXHIBIT(S) 9/1/16 & 9/16/16 Shapiro Correspondence Exhibit #: 14 11/07/2016
36 EXHIBIT(S) Cited Sections of the 2010 Building Code of NYS & NYS Residential Code Exhibit #: 15 11/07/2016
37 RJI -RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 11/07/2016
E-mail Service Notifications Sent
Name Email Address
STEVEN MOGEL smogel@sullivancountylawyers.com
Parties Without Representation

Court rules require hard copy service upon non-participating and opted-out parties. NYSCEF has no record of opt out or participation recorded for the parties listed below.

Party Name Role
YAKOV J. OSTREICHER Defendant/Respondent
ARON BINETH Defendant/Respondent
CONGREGATION YESHIVA ZERA YAKOV Defendant/Respondent
ANTHONY MALLIA Defendant/Respondent
THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE NAMED ADDRESSEE(S) AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE NEW YORK STATE COURTS ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM. IF YOU ARE NEITHER THE INTENDED RECIPIENT NOR A PERSON DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE MESSAGES ON BEHALF OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.
Paul Piperato ,  Rockland County Clerk   –   Piperatp@co.rockland.ny.us
Phone:  845-638-5094     Fax:  845-638-5073     Website:  http://www.rocklandcountyclerk.com

 

 

Coincidence? Or, are they at it Again… Mr. Stark? – NO CofO!!

16090810LexingtonCourtyard.jpg

The Gothamist:

New Brooklyn Luxury Building Welcomes Tenants Despite Lacking Certificate Of Occupancy

http://gothamist.com/2016/09/08/rent_with_an_option_to_bye.php

Joseph Brunner, described by The Real Deal along with his partner Abe Mandel as one of the “heavyweights” of Brooklyn’s Hasidic Jewish developers, with more than 100 buildings to his name (well, LLCs), bought the former Colonial Laundry building for $6.175 million in 2012.

The process of demolishing the factory and building the sleek residential building in its place was fraught with problems. Neighbors have complained to the city about construction 22 times since January 2015, and a contractor has paid out $12,400 for 12 serious building violations in that time. Infractions included working in hours outside of those allowed by permits, failing to enclose the construction site, failing to safeguard personnel, and failing to notify the DOB that excavation was beginning.

A neighbor, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution, said, “They’ve been such assholes every step of the way. It’s the shoddiest job I’ve ever seen.”

She complained that crews frequently worked late into the night and on weekends, and left debris on the sidewalk. During the final phase of construction, when workers were lining the facade with Styrofoam, her garden filled with balls of the stuff, “And I was picking it out of my five-month-old daughter’s hair.”

The neighbor added that a man from management once confronted her and, intimating that he knew she was calling 311, said, “Why do you care? Your street is already so dirty.” Later, she says he added, “I can deal with a lot of fines.”

The tenants we spoke to all shared stories that, though they diverged in some respects, were consistent on several key points. Specifically, they said that the leasing agents, operating out of an office marked “Bedford Lofts” at 105 Leonard Street in South Williamsburg, refused to give them copies of their leases (“Oh shit, I think we may not have gotten a copy,” one said when told about the others’ stories. His roommates confirmed it.); that management promised the building would be finished by September 1st; and when it wasn’t, that management offered them amounts ranging from $100 to $140 a night to stay in hotels until the inspectors sign off. No one we spoke to has been reimbursed yet.

Several tenants are also awaiting the construction of new walls in their apartments, to partition off an extra bedroom (a text message exchange between an agent and a tenant seems to confirm this arrangement). They say they have been told that the work will be done after inspectors come through and sign off on the building. Such new construction would, of course, only be legal with the applicable permits.

A man named George who answered at a number listed for a brokerage representing the building called Yuri Management told me there is an available “one bedroom-two bedroom flex. It comes as a one-bedroom, but could be flexed as a two-bedroom, meaning they could come in and cut out some of the cabin space.”

Asked why people are saying that there is no certificate of occupancy, George said, “What happened was, during the inspection, they didn’t get one of the signatures.” He said the move-in date has been delayed to September 15th. But three tenants told me that Mittelman, the property manager, informed them this week that the building has passed inspections and is okay to move into.

The tenants whose situations we reviewed—a mix of financiers, social services professionals, and students at nearby Pratt Institute—are stressed. One trio of students is staying with friends and hoping to pocket the money. They are angry about the alleged bait-and-switch, but question how much more they can do to hold Brunner accountable. “We’re all so busy with school already, and it’s so hard just getting ahold of management,” one said. “And besides, we don’t have our lease. Nothing is in writing.”

My guide around the building said the experience for him has been “Actually kind of fun,” given that he works in Downtown Brooklyn and has been sampling the neighborhood’s hotel offerings with his girlfriend. For his roommates, who have more far-flung professional jobs, “It’s definitely more disruptive.”

Another tenant is planning to withhold rent—all incoming tenants we spoke to got September “free”—and consulting lawyers.

The moving in of tenants to an un-permitted luxury development is eerily similar to the case of 120 South Fourth Street, which remains evacuated nearly a year after building inspectors forced residents out when inspectors conducting an audit—the department had previously signed off on the building—discovered 3,000 square feet of structural framing and concrete floor had been built without permits. That building is owned by Abraham Bernat, the brother-in-law of slain Williamsburg landlord Menachem Stark, and a principal of the firm The Bedford Lofts LLC.

It’s not clear that there is a connection, but when the tenant who is considering lawyering up first heard that 10 Lexington lacked a C of O and started to do some research, he encountered a story about Bernat’s foibles and realized his leasing agent was working for a company by a similar name. “I thought to myself, ‘Oh, no, not this guy,'” he said.

The tenant recalled having asked repeatedly for a copy of the lease, but being told by the agents that the owner needed to add a few provisions to the generic lease and would mail him a copy.

“In retrospect, I was probably a little too trusting,” he said. A text exchange seems to verify that he requested a copy of the lease and was told to wait by a leasing agent.

As for the predicament he’s now in, the tenant said, “It’s ridiculous. All of these people have nowhere to stay.”

The Buildings Department spokesman said it audited Brunner’s permits during construction and forced the builders to change certain things to comply with the building code. Now, the spokesman said, the agency is planning to send inspectors once more.

Joel Mittelman, the building manager, did not respond to an email seeking comment or a message left at his Google Voice number. Another number listed for him on a permit application rang to a voicemail that is not set up. The number of a lawyer for Joshua Brunner listed on the purchasing records for 10 Lexington has been disconnected. Abraham Bernat did not respond to a voicemail seeking comment.

Update 4:45 p.m.:

An unnamed representative of the building—it’s not clear if the person works for Bruman Realty, Bedford Lofts, or some other company—sent the following statement from a 10lexington.com email address:

As the leasing office we started signing leases in July with the understanding that our inspections for the certificate of occupancy would be complete in Mid-August. As such, the lease start dates were listed for September. The building did not receive the certificate of occupancy sign off yet as expected even though the building does have all other signoffs needed.

Landlord intends to fully comply with the term of all the leases. No tenant has received permission to occupy space in the building, However, landlord did allow as an accommodation for certain tenants that wanted to store their furniture and personal effects into the building for storage purposes only during the pendency of any ministerial delay.
Further more the Landlord has offered to pay the cost of hotels to every tenant that was not able to move in to his apartment to reduce any inconvenience on the new tenants side.

In terms of accessory spaces, it is correct that the roof deck is not yet built. It will be constructed in the coming months. With regard to the courtyard, since most tenants did not rent parking space it is the intention of the owners to make an application to BSA for a waiver of the parking requirements to include a courtyard area in the existing structure, since there is already enough parking spaces in the basement.

 

Community Board Shoots Down Upper West Side Condo Proposal

Upper West Side Synagogue’s Condo Plan Rejected by Community Board

 Congregation Shearith Israel wants to build a nine-story community center with five condos on the top stories directly behind its synagogue on West 70th Street.

Congregation Shearith Israel wants to build a nine-story community center with five condos on the top stories directly behind its synagogue on West 70th Street.View Full Caption

 

UPPER WEST SIDE — A synagogue seeking approval for a controversial plan to build a community center and condos behind the house of worship had its designs rejected by Community Board 7 Tuesday, an action the city will take into account in deciding whether to grant approval to the project.

Congregation Shearith Israel is seeking approval for alterations to the interior design of its proposed 9-story building, which will include community space and five luxury condos, directly behind the synagogue at 8 W. 70th St.

The new plans need the green light from the Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA), a city agency that oversees real estate development, before the project can move forward. But the congregation’s presentation on Tuesday created too many questions for board members to sign off on the plan.

n Aug. 12, the BSA sent Congregation Shearith Israel a list of 40 questions to respond to regarding its plans before any decision is made, according to an email the BSA shared with DNAinfo and as previously reported by West Side Rag. 

The congregation has not yet sent its responses to the BSA, a lawyer representing Shearith Israel, Zachary Bernstein, told board members Tuesday.

CB 7 member Paige Crowley argued at the meeting that “it’s premature to take an action until we have this information at our fingertips. Right now it’s he said-she said.”

Given the lack of information, the full board voted to reject the project, a decision the congregation is “disappointed by,” Bernstein said Wednesday.

“Responses to the BSA’s request will be filed shortly and the Community Board will simultaneously receive these responses. We look forward to addressing any further questions during the BSA hearing process and are hopeful that the synagogue will receive the approvals needed to allow for development of its Community House,” he added.

Continue reading: https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20160825/upper-east-side/apartments-for-sale-homes-condos-co-op-real-estate-nyc-open-house

Protecting the Elderly: What Are NYS Assembly Members Doing? NOTHING!!!

joel-landauallure

 

To: Walter Mosley <waltertmosley@gmail.com>; Joseph Yanis <yanisj@assembly.state.ny.us>; “cymbros@assembly.state.ny.us” <cymbros@assembly.state.ny.us>; Monica Miller <millerm@assembly.state.ny.us>; Kristin Williams <williamsk@assembly.state.ny.us>; Cathy Peake <peakec@assembly.state.ny.us>; Adrienne Knoll <knolla@assembly.state.ny.us>; JoAnn VanSlyke <vanslykej@assembly.state.ny.us>; JoAnne Simon <simonj@assembly.state.ny.us>; “felder@nysenate.gov” <felder@nysenate.gov>; “ott@nysenate.gov” <ott@nysenate.gov>; “bender@nysenate.gov” <bender@nysenate.gov>; Susan Serino <serino@nysenate.gov>; “farley@nysenate.gov” <farley@nysenate.gov>; “golden@nysenate.gov” <golden@nysenate.gov>; “hassellt@senate.state.ny.us” <hassellt@senate.state.ny.us>; Brad Hoylman <hoylman@nysenate.gov>; “eli@bradhoylman.com” <eli@bradhoylman.com>; “larkin@senate.state.ny.us” <larkin@senate.state.ny.us>; “little@nysenate.gov” <little@nysenate.gov>; “martins@nysenate.gov” <martins@nysenate.gov>; “montgome@nysenate.gov” <montgome@nysenate.gov>; Terrence P. Murphy <murphy@nysenate.gov>; “panepinto@nysenate.gov” <panepinto@nysenate.gov>; “grivera@nysenate.gov” <grivera@nysenate.gov>; “seward@nysenate.gov” <seward@nysenate.gov>; Catharine Young <cyoung@nysenate.gov>; Office of Assembly Member Dick Gottfried W. Paster <pasterw@assembly.state.ny.us>; Alyssa Jacobs <jacobsa@nyassembly.gov>; “braunsteine@assembly.state.ny.us” <braunsteine@assembly.state.ny.us>; “cahillk@assembly.state.ny.us” <cahillk@assembly.state.ny.us>; “clarkb@assembly.state.ny.us” <clarkb@assembly.state.ny.us>; “dinowij@assembly.state.ny.us” <dinowij@assembly.state.ny.us>; “galefs@assembly.state.ny.us” <galefs@assembly.state.ny.us>; “garbarinoa@assembly.state.ny.us” <garbarinoa@assembly.state.ny.us>; “goodella@assembly.state.ny.us” <goodella@assembly.state.ny.us>; “gunthea@assembly.state.ny.us” <gunthea@assembly.state.ny.us>; “hevesia@assembly.state.ny.us” <hevesia@assembly.state.ny.us>; “jaffeee@assembly.state.ny.us” <jaffeee@assembly.state.ny.us>; “lavinec@assembly.state.ny.us” <lavinec@assembly.state.ny.us>; “mayers@assembly.state.ny.us” <mayers@assembly.state.ny.us>; “mcdonoughd@assembly.state.ny.us” <mcdonoughd@assembly.state.ny.us>; “paulina@assembly.state.ny.us” <paulina@assembly.state.ny.us>; “parker@senate.state.ny.us” <parker@senate.state.ny.us>; “chauvin@nysenate.gov” <chauvin@nysenate.gov>; “rae@assembly.state.ny.us” <rae@assembly.state.ny.us>; “raiaa@assembly.state.ny.us” <raiaa@assembly.state.ny.us>; Assemblymember Linda B. Rosenthal <rosenthall@assembly.state.ny.us>; “schimmr@assembly.state.ny.us” <schimmr@assembly.state.ny.us>; “steckp@assembly.state.ny.us” <steckp@assembly.state.ny.us>; Michael Stinson <stinsonm@assembly.state.ny.us>; “titonem@assembly.state.ny.us” <titonem@assembly.state.ny.us>; “walterr@assembly.state.ny.us” <walterr@assembly.state.ny.us>; “diaz@nysenate.gov” <diaz@nysenate.gov>; “lavalle@nysenate.gov” <lavalle@nysenate.gov>; “valesky@nysenate.gov” <valesky@nysenate.gov>; Kathleen Marchione <marchione@nysenate.gov>
Cc: Ibrahim Khan <ikhan@pubadvocate.nyc.gov>; Kenya Handy <khandy@comptroller.nyc.gov>; Hakeem Jeffries <hakeemjeffries@yahoo.com>; Dell Smitherman <dell.smitherman@1199.org>; Martin Nicholas (Schumer) <nicholas_martin@schumer.senate.gov>; Susan Lerner <slerner@commoncause.org>; Laast Ousman (Gillibrand)

It would be very easy and disingenuous to allow the problems of flipped NYC nursing homes and long term care facilities to be solely the Mayor’s problem in the Rivington House and CABs scandal. Ownership must be taken by NYS Governor Cuomo who appoints a failed Public Health and Health Planning Council. The PHHPC continues to ignore past infractions and certifies bad actors pretending to be long term care manager/owners in total complicity with criminal harm to the disabled and vulnerable elderly.

With all due respect you must equally be held to account. The state Assembly and Senate have  sidestepped constructing a Bill to force would-be long term care owners (privatizing non-profits in huge numbers) to REQUIRE a minimum of ONE YEAR notification to resident/patients for appropriate transition time and concurrently discourage flippers of real estate-too often one and the same owners of nursing home titles.

The question must be asked-why?

The question must be posed…why do Leading Age…Hinman Straub…HANYS…NYSHFA…NYSCAL…HCA…FQC…AHCA…NCAL… Owner/Operator lobbying groups and their PACs continue to influence your legislation when victims who are ALSO your constituents-have no voice and are slaughtered with no sanctions unless they engage malpractice attorneys or Legal Aid comes to save them???

Please listen to the Brian Lehrer radio show interview/investigation link below-revolving around the Rivington House scam…but understand this is the tip of the iceberg-the answer that the Dept of Health is “investigating the inappropriate discharge” is tantamount to having the FOX investigate the problems in the  hen house!

You need to take ownership…this is a matter of flouting the Americans With Disability Act protections guaranteed to the sick-disabled-and a human rights violation. This is also who you are as a human being with  conscience-these could be your own elderly loved ones.

Thank you.

 

NYC Nursing Homes Evacuate Patients Without Plans

 

http://www.wnyc.org/story/relocation-rivington-house-nursing-home-patients/

Aug 31, 2016
When a New York nursing home is going to close, operators are supposed to give the State Department of Health 90 days’ notice and submit a detailed plan on how patients will be transferred. The agency has to approve the plan before anyone gets moved out. But, according to a three-month investigation by WNYC, that didn’t happen at two New York City nursing homes –The Rivington House on the Lower East Side and CABS Nursing Home in Bedford Stuyvesant. Both nursing homes were bought by the same company and then sold to real estate companies for profit without giving patients, staff, or public officials proper foresight or factual information about the closures.

Cindy Rodriguez, WNYC urban policy reporter, discussed her reporting, and news that the state will investigate improper transfers of those residents that come forward.