Civil Immunity to Nursing Homes- A Blank Check for Abuse and Neglect, Covid-19

The following is an OPINION from Patricia Barnes at Forbes. We could not agree with the opinion more.

The Folly Of Granting Civil Immunity From Lawsuits To Nursing Homes

Granting broad immunity to nursing homes that failed to put in place reasonable protections for vulnerable residents during the pandemic represents an appalling abuse of the rule of law.

About 20 states already have granted nursing homes immunity from civil lawsuits stemming from the coronavirus pandemic and now the U.S. Congress is poised to do so. What’s the rush?

There has been no serious investigation into how nursing homes performed in the pandemic and there is plenty of reason for concern.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reported Friday that 31,782 nursing home residents have died from COVID-19 as of May 31, which is about 33% of the nation’s known coronavirus deaths. The highest number of deaths occurred in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, which were among the first to grant civil immunity to nursing homes.

A grant of immunity effectively eliminates civil legal redress for and on behalf of nursing home residents who died due of COVID-19 due to negligence and abuse.

Nursing home immunity makes it difficult, if not impossible, for family members of the ability to find out what happened to a loved one who died during a lockdown, alone and behind closed doors.

Worse still, society is left without the means to hold bad nursing homes operators accountable for patient abuse and neglect. It’s the equivalent of signing a blank check with no name and no ending date.

A Blank Check

A waiver under the present circumstances is the equivalent of signing a blank check. Who is the beneficiary?

The AARP reports that approximately 70 percent of the nation’s 15,600 nursing homes are for-profit corporations. In recent years, corporate nursing home owners have been criticized for using business models that squeeze profits out of nursing homes by leaving facilities poorly staffed and under-resourced. These corporations likely will be the primary beneficiaries of an immunity waiver.

American’s don’t know what led to the extraordinarily high number of nursing home deaths in the United States but one only has to look to Canada for clues.

The Canadian Armed Forces in April dispatched 1,675 troops to more than 30 hard hit nursing homes in Ontario and Quebec to provide humanitarian relief.  In some homes the Army found:

  • COVID-19 positive residents wandered freely among non-positive patients.
  • Staff wore the same protective equipment in COVID-19 positive and non-positive units.
  • “[A] general culture of fear to use supplies because they cost money.”
  • Expired medications apparently were dispensed for weeks.
  • Rotten food and cockroach/fly infestations.
  • Some patients didn’t get three meals a day.
  • Patients left for hours in soiled pads and diapers.

The New York Times recently investigated deaths at the Isabella Geriatric Center in New York, where more than a 100 residents died. Two nurses said employees there wore the same personal protective equipment to handle both Covid and non-Covid residents, thus “creating avenues for the virus to spread.”

To continue reading click here.

5 thoughts on “Civil Immunity to Nursing Homes- A Blank Check for Abuse and Neglect, Covid-19

  1. At the Baycrest hospital and retirement center in Toronto, only two patients and no staff members have died from the Covid-19 virus since March 20. Baycrest traces its roots back to the city’s old Jewish immigrant area but now operates a sizeable geriatric complex including assisted living facilities. Read more about Baycrest here: http://www.baycrest.org/

    Like

  2. HOLOCAUST WAS NEEDED TO GET RID OF THE OLD, SICK & THE YOUNG JEWS
    The question which remains is who would decide who was “the best type of Jew”? As will soon be seen, such a Jew was someone who was a secular Zionist!
    It was a few years later at the 20th Zionist Congress held in Zurich in August 1937, that Weizmann spelled out more specifically what was meant by “selective Aliyah.”

    DELETED TEXT BY EDITOR OF LM

    6) * Official Minutes of the 20th Zionist Congress, (Jerusalem: Executive of the Zionist Organisation and the Jewish Agency), pp.32-33.
    7) * Montor to Rabinowitz, 1 February 1940, pp.2, 4, (Jabotinsky Archives, HT-10/16).
    8) * A. Hartglas, Comments concerning assistance and rescue, (April/May 1943 – possibly 24 April 1943), p.1, (CZA S26/1306 [previous no. S26/1232]).
    9) Aryeh Morgenstern, “Vaad hahatzalah hameuchad .…,” Yalkut Moreshet, (Tel Aviv: Moreshet), vol.13, June 1971, p.95 fn.67.
    10) * Hartglas, op. cit., p.3.

    SOURCE:
    THE SECULAR ZIONIST AGENDA FOR A JEWISH STATE
    Rabbi Dr. Chaim Simons
    chaimsimons@gmail.com
    August 2007
    © Copyright. 2007. Chaim Simons

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.