Westchester Torah Academy – and a Ground-broken Historic Cemetery [UPDATED 1.30.18]

new_campus_open_house_1

Special Thanks to the Community connected to WTA for their Assistance in Updating this Article [1.30.19]:

The below article was posted in August of 2018 regarding a parcel purchase absent disclosure of a cemetery and the Halachic implications. We thought it of interest but really rather mundane, an interesting question of Halachic law. However, in the last few days the post has elicited a significant amount of attention. What we believed to be a rather academic question seemed to have been far greater; and caring members of the community connected to WTA wanted to correct the record.

As such we have attached as a PDF a copy of the Deed provided to us by a member of the WTA community. deed oct 2015

Pages 7-8 indicate that the cemetery lands are separate parcels from the rest of the property which can be found on pages 5-6.

WTA had a survey conducted, which should be requested directly from WTA, which indicates that the cemetery is divided from the rest of the property with a stone wall and a driveway. As such, if there were even any to begin with, there should be no Halachic problems.

In truth, we suppose that the same Kohanim who cover themselves is plastic bags every time they fly are likely the same people who would not deem themselves suited to go to the academy. They probably should not be visiting large swaths of Manhattan, Queens and Valhalla either.

We offer our sincere thanks to those who helped provide us with the information and the update. We are rarely able to get responses from many of the public schools and Yeshivas with which we are in contact when we have questions to articles or information we receive; and we cannot help but to be appreciative.

LM

UPDATED: 1.21.19 – Apparently we have been advised that the cemetery is an entirely different lot that the academy has committed to maintaining.  

With great pride, the Westchester Torah Academy, Announced their New Location, sans the disclosure of the cemetery.

They Forgot about the Historic Cemetery of Joseph Carpenter, see below.

The property purchased for the future home of the Westchester Torah Academy has a Cemetery on it. The property is located at 150 Stratton Road in New Rochelle and here is a link identifying the Cemetery at this location:
Given the edicts of Jewish law, it’s questionable if Kohanim would be allowed on the property.

Carpenter Cemetery

Source: The Cemeteries of Westchester County, Vol. III, Patrick Raftery, Westchester County Historical Society, 2011.

Location: 150 Stratton Road, New Rochelle, NY. North side of Stratton Road between the driveway for the Saint Nersess Armenian Seminary and the Iona Preparatory School athletic fields (about four-tenths of a mile east of Wilmot Road).

Dates of Activity: 1838 —1905.

Joseph Carpenter was an “old Quaker gentlemen” who owned a farm which during the mid-19th century stretched westward from Weaver Street to the present site of the Saint Nersess Armenian Seminary. Mr. Carpenter served as the executor of the will of Joseph Thomas Turpin, a former slave who owned a parcel on Pelham Road that had once been used by Trinity Church as a cemetery for African Americans. Perhaps through his connection with Mr. Turpin, Joseph Carpenter realized the need for a proper burial place for the black citizens of New Rochelle and its surrounding area. To solve this problem, he donated an acre of his land for use as a cemetery for African Americans in a 1838 deed transferring the land to several municipalities in southern Westchester County, namely, New Rochelle, Mamaroneck, Scarsdale and Eastchester.

Aaron M. Powell, a prominent Quaker and member of the Anti-Slavery Society, commented on Mr. Carpenter’s commitment to providing a suitable burial place for the black citizens of southeast Westchester:
There was much prejudice against colored people in this region, so much, that at that time in New Rochelle colored people were denied burial in any of its cemeteries or burial places. To meet this difficulty Joseph Carpenter set apart a portion of one of the fields of his [New Rochelle] farm as a burial plot for the colored people. By his direction his own body was interred therein. I visited him a short time previous to his death, when he acquainted me with this arrangement for the disposition of his body, as a last testimony against the then prevailing – and, alas, still prevalent – unchristian color prejudice. In accordance with his wish I also attended his funeral, and to those assembled bore my testimony to his memory and great personal worth. It was an occasion long to be remembered. His body, clothed in his wonted plain Friendly costume, was placed for burial, as he had also directed, in a plain, unstained pine coffin. At the conclusion of the services the coffin was carried out upon the lawn, in the shade of the trees he loved so well, and then those in attendance, colored and white, gathered about it to take a last look at the face of him whom they loved and reverenced. Then it was borne by colored men, who had requested the privilege, to its final resting place, among those of the proscribed colored people whom he had befriended. At a later period the body of Margaret Carpenter, the wife, a woman of sterling worth, sharing fully the deep feeling of her husband concerning the great injustice from which the colored people, both bond and free, were sufferers, was also interred in this unique, and now historic, burial plot.

In 1889 George T. Davis noted that the number of burials in the cemetery “average[d] about 10 per year.”” Among those interred in the Carpenter Cemetery was Mrs. Carrie Gifelt (b.1848), whose funeral procession on April 21, 1896, attracted a considerable amount of interest:
[Mrs. Gilfert] was a devout Christian lady, and a member of the Ladies Aid Society of the [A.M.E.] church…. Six members of the Ladies Aid Society, attired in long mourning gowns of black and white, officiated as pall-bearers, and escorted her remains to the Church and thence to the Upper New Rochelle Colored Cemetery…. This is the first occasion in New Rochelle of an adult’s funeral attended by female pall-bearers, and was quite a novelty to the spectators who witnessed the funeral en-route to the cemetery.
The farm which bordered the east side of this cemetery remained in the hands of the Carpenter family until 1906, when Phila Jane Carpenter sold the parcel to Francis A. Stratton. This transaction caused some concern among the friends and relatives of those who were interred there, as was noted by the New York Times:
President F.A. Stratton of the Westchester Lighting Company, who recently paid $65,000 for a farm on the Wilmot Road in Upper New Rochelle, finds that he is also the possessor of a negro cemetery with 400 graves in it…. The last burial there was that of a white woman who had a negro husband. She was buried a week ago. The negroes of New Rochelle are very much concerned because they have heard that Mr. Stratton intends to build a mansion on the place, which will mean that the cemetery will be wiped out and the gravestones raised. The negroes have no control over the graveyard because the man who deeded the property to them named a board of trustees, and the last member of the original board of trustees died twenty years ago. Mr. Stratton is in Maine on his vacation, and a gang of men is clearing the land for building purposes.
These fears were unsubstantiated as the deed for Mr. Stratton’s property noted that his purchase did not include the graveyard. Nevertheless, this transaction marked the end of the Carpenter Cemetery’s existence as an active burial ground. In 1939 Morgan Seacord noted that the “earliest known stone” in the Carpenter Cemetery “is that of James Tudor, 1839. The names of others suggest retainers of early white families of New Rochelle, among whom are Landrine, Bonnet, Pugsley, and Bailey.”2 Unfortunately, the condition of the cemetery deteriorated in the first half of the 20th century, a fact that was noted by the DAR in their 1940 survey of burial grounds in New Rochelle:
The cemetery is in a most neglected state at the present time. There are many stones, set up in rows, most of them plain field stones without marks. A number of small stones have initials on them. The only stone with an inscription at present standing is a double stone to T. Cornelius [d.1901] and Eliza Bonnett [d.1899]. 

Sadly, the neglect mentioned above has continued to the present, as the cemetery is full of the “trees, brush, briars [and] noxious weeds” that Joseph Carpenter had empowered the superintendents of the burial ground to remove. There is no sign or marker to denote the cemetery’s existence, and to the unknowing observer it appears to be nothing more than an overgrown patch of land.

19 thoughts on “Westchester Torah Academy – and a Ground-broken Historic Cemetery [UPDATED 1.30.18]

      • Nothing in particular. Just hearing feedback from the community and reading blogs like this it always seems as if westchester torah academy has or creates their own bad luck. Everything from founder Mark Nordlicht being indicted for running a billion dollar ‘ponzi-like’ scheme (with the trial starting today), Mrs Nordlicht staying involved with the school but hiding behind her maiden name of Dahlia Kalter, buying property with a cemetery, permitting children to attend the school who have not been vaccinated and not because of religious reasons, a month or two ago having an established competing yeshiva revamp their tuition providing even lower cost tuition to many parents than westchester torah academy offers, having an extremely high attrition rate of students and teachers, etc

        Like

        • Interesting post as I just read an article in the NY Times about the Summit Learning program WTA uses

          Sounds like Summit is a disaster and I feel sorry for the kids being subjected to it.

          Like

        • We were accused of trying to sabotage WTA so we have largely remained distant. We were not trying to sabotage the school but to get to the bottom of shady financial transactions and a few toxic investors. We believe that the Nordlicht involvement is on shaky ground for a host of reasons but again, our goal was to bring a situation to light not to sabotage. If there is anything we can do to help for the kids, we are happy to do so. The cemetery is something to which we cannot relate, at all.
          And we were assured that it wasn’t relevant.

          Like

          • Completely understand.

            Yeshiva University Commentator wrote an article when Nordlicht was indicted that mentioned his connection to WTA. YU commented that they received requests to quell their article after it was published.

            One has to wonder if there resources are being allocated to cleansing the internet of information that paint certain individuals and entities in a bad light.

            Like

  1. As part of a school visit Kohanim (parents and children) can decide for themselves and ponder the following:

    a) If the cemetery was a completely different plot of land, why did WTA spend parent and donor money to purchase it? And why commit to spend further money to maintain it?
    b) Using Google maps street view, the wall around the cemetery is not visible being either obscured by the overgrowth or perhaps sections are missing or crumbled after 100+ years of not being maintained.
    c) Is the wall tall enough to count as a barrier?
    d) Kids being kids, will there be an additional barrier to prevent students from physically reaching the cemetery?

    Like

    • Thank you very much for following up and following the post. Again, we must commend those who took the time to get in touch with us and clear things up. We do question the finances and the disclosures; we also question why money is being spent on a cemetery but it is also not without historic and preservation implications and we think that is a good thing. Thanks for your follow up and for following the post so closely.

      Like

      • Thank you for this blog!

        As for the cemetery, it would be most unusual for a yeshiva to purchase a cemetery (let alone a non-Jewish cemetery) in the name of preserving history. WTA does however claim to be the yeshiva of the future and it would be wonderful if your hypothesis about why WTA purchased the cemetery is correct.

        Like

        • We were directly in contact with people intimately involved with WTA and can only rely on assurances and documents we were provided. We cannot vouchsafe the state of the finances at WTA as a whole, something we have questioned for quite some time. But with regard to the cemetery, painstaking effort was made to provide us with information. So we would like to think that it speaks to a well-rounded guiding principle. Our hope is that the kids will be introduced to the history regarding that property and will learn the importance and symbolism behind it. Time will tell.

          Like

          • Out of curiosity, I took a trip past the WTA’s new campus today.

            I would humbly suggest that any parent concerned about the situation of the cemetery visit the campus and make a personal decision as to the state of the cemetery wall for themselves. After viewing WTA’s survey at their current campus, the new campus is just four minutes away at 150 Stratton Road, New Rochelle, NY — just google it.

            The cemetery is bounded by:
            o The driveway (cemetery is to the right as one would drive onto the property)
            o The main road — if you are turning right onto the property, the cemetery to immediately to your right
            o Another building of some sort on the campus behind the cemetery
            o A Baseball Field

            It’s an acre in size and filled with tall trees. I imagine they’re nice shade trees in the Summer.

            Liked by 1 person

  2. Your post was about a cemetery. And it was inaccurate. Journalistic integrity requires a retraction or correction. At a minimum.

    Like

  3. Your anonymous posts are as irresponsible as they are inaccurate and cowardly. The cemetery is an entirely separate lot that WTA has committed to maintaining. Come over and I’ll show you. Your vendetta against one former board member does not excuse intentional damage to the school’s 150 students.

    Like

    • There is no vendetta. In fact, your former board member(s) may be responsible for the loss of finances of the school. It is remarkable that you would even post this given the situation with the school’s finances and where that money came from and may have gone to.

      Like

      • Indeed… let’s look at the deed…

        https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=7KZfpI9/rYKXmcUZMACIyg==&system=prod
        “ST. NERSES ARMENIAN SEMINARY, INC (formerly known as St. Nersess Armenian Theological School, Inc.) a New York not-for-profit corporation, located at 488 Bedford Road, Armonk, New York 10504, party of the “Grantor,”

        AND

        WESTCHESTER TORAH ACADEMY, a New York religious corporation, located at 1000 Pine Brook Road, New Rochelle, New York 10804, party of the second part or “Grantee,”

        And it goes on to say…

        “AS TO CEMETERY LANDS: BEING AND INTENDED TO BE **** the same premises **** conveyed to St. Nerses Armenian Theological School, Inc from the Scandinavian Evangelical Emanual Luther Church by Deed dataed February 1, 1978 and recorded February 15, 1978 in Liber 7452, Page 424”

        Basically, the Deed does say the Cemetery is on the same premises/plot of land.

        Like

    • Given WTA’s mission is to provide an affordable Jewish education, If the cemetery was a separate property, why would the WTA spend the parents’ and donors’ money to purchase the cemetery and maintain it?

      Also, are you claiming that a lot (a sub-section of a plot/property) is not part of the plot/property itself? Is this secular law or Halakha?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.