Credit Card Swiping Schemes – The Trade for Points, Is this Points Laundering?

Collecting Points for Charges Without Providing any Services or Items for those Charges

NATURE OF ACTION (Directly From the Complaint)

1. This action arises from certain of the defendants (hereinafter the “Merchant
Defendants”) fraudulent charging of the American Express, Visa, MasterCard and Discover branded credit and charge cards previously issued to the Plaintiffs (hereinafter the “Cards”) by American Express, Chase and certain other defendants (the “Card Issuer Defendants”), which  fraudulent payment card transactions (the “Card Transactions”) were electronically processed by other defendants (the “Card Processor Defendants”). The Merchant Defendants provided no goods, services or anything of value to the Plaintiffs with respect to the Card Transactions. Instead, the  Merchant Defendants fraudulently induced the Plaintiffs to allow the Merchant Defendants to utilize the Plaintiffs’ Cards to ostensibly purchase goods that the Merchant Defendants were planning to re-sell, with the promise that the Merchant Defendants were then going to use the proceeds from the sale of the goods to pay the full amount of the balances due to the Card Issuer Defendants for those Card Transactions prior to the payment due date.

2. The Plaintiffs understood the Card Transactions to be a proper use of their Cards
for the purchase of cash or cash equivalents from the Merchant Defendants, consistent with the  manner that the Merchant Defendants had been utilizing other cardholders’ cards for many years  (which prior transactions had significantly benefited the Card Issuer Defendants and the Card  Processor Defendants, who received substantial revenue in the form of processing fees for the prior
transactions). Indeed, virtually all of the Plaintiffs had previously engaged in virtually identical payment card transactions with the Merchant Defendants, for which previous card transactions the  Merchant Defendants had in fact paid cash or cash equivalents to the Plaintiffs themselves or on  behalf of the Plaintiffs to the Card Issuer Defendants.

3. Despite due demand therefor, the Merchant Defendants have failed and refused to provide the Plaintiffs with cash or cash equivalents for the Card Transactions. The Merchant  Defendants have also failed and refused to provide the Plaintiffs with the goods ostensibly bought for resale by the Merchant Defendants via the Card Transactions. Many of the Plaintiffs were assured by the Merchant Defendants that the use of their Cards for the Card Transactions by the Merchant Defendants were secured by those goods, which would be the property of the Plaintiffs
until resale and could be claimed (and resold for more than the amount of the Transactions) by the  Plaintiffs in the event that the Merchant Defendants failed to timely provide to Plaintiffs the cash or cash equivalents for the Card Transactions.

4. Accordingly, having not received anything of value from the Merchant Defendants  in connection with the Card Transactions, the Plaintiffs attempted to utilize the protections afforded them by and through the payment card networks and to dispute the charges for the Card  Transactions with the Card Issuer Defendants, protections extended to the Plaintiffs through their
agreements with the Card Issuer Defendants. The Plaintiffs expected that this chargeback process  would result in the Merchant Defendants – and/or those who aided or abetted the Merchant defendants’ fraud and/or guaranteed the Merchant Defendants’ compliance with the Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover rules, being held responsible for the Card  Transactions. The Merchant Defendants have instead resisted the Plaintiffs’ attempts to dispute the charges, at times misrepresenting to the payment card networks the nature of the relationship
between the Plaintiffs and the Merchant Defendants and at other times misrepresenting the nature of the Card Transactions. Even when accurate information regarding the Plaintiffs and the Card Transactions have been conveyed to the Card Issuer Defendants, the chargebacks have usually been reversed, and the charges to the Plaintiffs for the Card Transactions have been reinstated on
the Plaintiffs’ account statements for the Cards.

To continue reading the court documents click here.

The US Nursing Home Travesty of Justice, Financial Fraud, Patient Abuse, Government Neglect and Liability and the Profiteers who Profit From it all

The Rosewood Care Center in Inverness, Ill., was backed by a program run by the Department of Housing and Urban Development that insures loans to more than 2,300 nursing homes across the country. CreditCreditDanielle Scruggs for The New York Times

$146 Million Default by Nursing Home Chain Leaves U.S. on the Hook

The cracks in the foundation of a Chicago nursing-home business began to appear almost immediately.

The owners stopped making mortgage payments on their crown jewel, the Rosewood Care Centers, barely a year after buying it in 2013. Paperwork about the chain’s finances was never filed with the government. Some money meant for the 13 nursing homes and assisted-living facilities went to prop up another investment.

In the end, the business defaulted last year on $146 million in government-backed mortgages — the biggest collapse in the history of a little-known loan-guarantee program run by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The Rosewood debacle demonstrates the problems plaguing the HUD program, which helps nursing homes obtain affordable loans and has become a linchpin of the American elder-care system.

By the government’s own admission, the federal agency’s stewardship of the program has been haphazard. Its oversight of nursing homes has been weak. When HUD officials have spotted problems, they often have been slow to respond. Sometimes it has taken years to intervene, allowing the finances at certain facilities to unravel to such an extent that the quality of care was undermined.

HUD officials described Rosewood as an outlier, saying that only 1 percent of the guaranteed loans end up defaulting. “Mortgage defaults in this program are exceedingly rare, yet reaching an acceptable resolution requires an owner’s willingness and ability to work on behalf of their residents,” the department said in a statement.

But the program — run by a department better known for fostering affordable housing — is a vulnerability for the federal agency. The nursing home industry is increasingly being run by for-profit operators facing dwindling margins. Some homes — especially those in rural areas — are struggling to stay open, with operators blaming low occupancy and insufficient payments from Medicaid and Medicare.

Continue reading

Black Elk and the Bond Proceeds – Another Platinum Bait-and-Switch

Law360, New York (May 30, 2019, 9:59 PM EDT) — Jurors in the securities fraud trial of former top Platinum Partners executives on Thursday heard of how co-founder Mark Nordlicht floated plans to wield control over bonds of the hedge fund’s portfolio company Black Elk Offshore Operations LLC using Platinum affiliates, which prosecutors say was part of a scheme to defraud the oil and gas driller’s bondholders.

Prosecutors say Nordlicht, former Platinum co-chief investment officer David Levy and others used their secret sway over the majority of $150 million in Black Elk bonds to funnel the bulk of proceeds from a sale of the company’s assets back to Platinum, ahead of bondholders who had priority to the funds.

During the testimony of Black Elk’s former outside counsel at BakerHostetler, W. Robert Shearer, the jury heard of how a group of independent bondholders in late 2013 were threatening to push the bonds into default after Black Elk violated the indenture’s terms by exceeding its limits on capital expenditures.

To read the remainder of the article, you will need a Law360 Subscription, click here.

Platinum Partners – Nordlicht, Levy and SanFilippo and A Crime So Complicated No One Understands it

IMG_8796

If Mark Nordlicht, David Levy and Joseph SanFilippo are Acquitted, it will not be Because no Fraud was Committed but Because the Whole Story was Too Confusing, Even for Defense Attorney Baez

Jose Baez is representing Mark Nordlicht in Nordlicht’s fraud trial. Baez is a remarkable and seasoned attorney. He knows the law. He knows his jury. He tests the boundaries of his questions with a bright smile; and he knows how to defend his client with the sheer will of his conviction.  As defense counsel, Baez draws blood from stones. He pulls rabbits from hats. He colors the wings of butterflies while in mid flight; and he sets a scene creating doubt like a Picasso with a paintbrush shading his canvas.

So long as there is doubt, there cannot be a conviction. And the intricacies of the Platinum Ponzi Scheme were so savvy, we would be surprised if there were even a modicum of steadfast clarity for the jurors. We can only hope the government has some more tricks up its sleeves.

Unlike a murder trial where there are black and white lines drawn with very few grey areas, fraud is grey and murky. The waters one needs to navigate to convict a fraudster require a periscope that can see through a curved mirror and a jury that can see through the clouds.

Baez and the counsel for co-Defendants Levy and SanFilippo picked their jury well, not a jury of Platinum’s partners’ peers, but a jury of African Americans and young adults. There may not be a Jew among them. It is hard to tell. 

And the subject matter of the Platinum case, along with the Jewish identity associated with Platinum’s main partners and its investors is ripe for confusion, so much so that today even Baez seemed to falter.

Baez began his cross examination of the witness, Daniel Mandelbaum a former CFO for Platinum, by asking whether he was Hasidic. Mandlebaum responded with an unequivocal, “No”. Baez then attempted to somehow change Mandelbaum’s response by associating Hasidic with a wife covering her hair and a man wearing a kippa. Mandelbaum was almost offended.  A jury, like Baez, would not understand the distinction between Mandelbaum’s Orthodoxy and Hasidim. But the word “Hasidic” carries its own subliminal messages. 

Baez was playing on anti-Semitisim and associations and as such setting the stage for a cultural and religious sort of confusion.

The Platinum Partners’ partners are largely modern Orthodox. Many of them live in the same neighborhood. They share the same simchas (joyous events), attend synagogue together, break bread together raise their children together, gossip with the same people, sit shiva when someone dies and keep up with one another’s increases in wealth. There are very few secrets within this community, something the jury, like Baez will not understand.

And, the investors like the partners were community members, a part of the larger Jewish Zeitgeist, only too eager to hand over their money to Nordlicht whom they trusted. That trust defined the nature of the investment and by implication, the seriousness of the crimes. They were defrauded, and sadly blinded by their own sense of community. 

The investors were wooed by Mark Nordlicht and Murray Huberfeld, David Bodner and David Levy so much so that they did not see the signs, the patterns, the inconsistencies, the numbers and returns that made no sense. They were victims, Jewish or otherwise. Mark Nordlicht knew his craft and his audience; and he dictated and controlled the documents and hence the grift. For Baez, the documents protected Platinum and Nordlicht because they were a measure of “disclosure” a waiver of sorts. For us, they were confusing and confused. They represent an admission of guilt and by deviating from market standard, the fraud committed was all the more criminal.

The overly complicated investment documents, nuanced to give Nordlicht control over every aspect of the investment, including discretionary redemptions,  a/k/a proprietary redemptions were part of Mandelbaum’s discomfit. As a matter of general business course, when redemptions are to be distributed, they are done pari passu with other members of the class of investors requesting redemptions.

By their very nature, redemptions should not be discretionary, not even for a Holocaust survivor. One of the redemptions Nordlicht did satisfy was to a Holocaust survivor. This was not done out of the goodness of Nordlicht’s heart but out of a knowledge that he should not have taken the man’s money in the first place. That’s a story for another day. The goodness of an investment manager’s heart, or lack thereof, is not something that should play into a privately held investment vehicle.  Suffice it to say, proprietary redemptions of the sort advertised in the Platinum Partners’ private placement documents were inherently fraudulent insofar as they provided preferential and discretionary treatment. As such, investors of the same class were not pari passu with others of the same class. That is, by its very nature, a fraud. 

As Baez rightfully pointed out many times, Nordlicht had discretion. NORDLICHT HAD DISCRETION. But he also had the ability to move money from one fund to another virtually unhindered. It was all a shell game.

Mandelbaum was, during his shortlived employment with Platinum, savvy enough to see the problems, Mark Nordlicht controlled everything. There were too few checks and balances.

Baez emphasized that point by sharing screens and screens of Platinum’s various documents. But in his cross examination he stumbled over the mere suggestion that the level of discretion provided to Nordlicht was anything but acceptable. The purpose of disclosures and documents in the securities world is in short “fairness.” Investments, win or lose, high risk or low risk, are supposed to be, at the very least, fair. A jury will never understand that and Baez, as a defense counsel doesn’t have to.  

Baez asked Daniel Mandelbaum about a loan from one Platinum Partners fund to another, demanding to know whether Mandelbaum had the right, during his tenure, to question the propriety of that loan. Sixteen percent (16%) in 2015 was too high. Mandelbaum responded that generally the lender gets to decide the interest rate. The Lender was Platinum a/k/a Nordlicht. The Borrower was Platinum a/k/a Nordlicht. There was no interest rate that would have made legal sense given the financially incestuous nature of the funds and their investors. Sixteen percent was simply a shnorer-type number. Nordlicht might have wanted to choose 18% instead.

At the end of the day, Nordlicht and Platinums’ partners have likely convinced themselves and anyone who will listen that they are being wrongly accused. Why us?  The defense counsel have collectively done a splendid job keeping Murray Huberfeld’s name from being mentioned at Nordlicht’s trial. When Huberfeld is mentioned, the defense insures that his 30 month conviction for bribery is not disclosed to the jury. While Federal rules of evidence may preclude this information from being conveyed to the jury, the fact remains, it was this bribe that tipped the FEDS off to the nefarious and criminal behavior of Platinum Partners’ partners. Keeping the jury in the dark will not change this fact. 

In the event that Nordlict and his fellow Defendants are acquitted, which is not unlikely due to the complexity of the case and the ignorance of the jury, it will not be the last time that the house wins. The house always wins! 

Ultimately, the very fact that Nordlicht had the discretion in all things Platinum, a point drafted into Platinum’s funds’ documents, and emphasized repeatedly by Baez, should tell the whole story. But by and by, the jury gets to decide. We fear that Baez painted a very confusing picture by his own lack of understanding of the documents themselves. It was likely quite intentional. He is a gifted attorney. And if the Defendant’s are acquitted, he will have graduated from the Sorcerer’s apprentice to the Sorcerer himself.

We give Baez credit which cannot be understated. If you are confused, you are supposed to be.  If not, it’s a shame you are not sitting in the jury box.

 

 

How to Stop Scammers – from the Eyes of the Orthodox – The Yeshiva World Analysis, Interesting Read

“Sadly, immoral individuals have often applied the following 5 step method to ripping off substantial funds from members of our community for years.
  1. Give a large donation to an institution with a wealthy donor base. Do so magnanimously and genuinely try to help out that institution – showing that it is dear to your heart.
  2. Come up with a false, but effective sounding business plan or investment strategy, and casually talk about it to wealthy individuals.
  3. Name drop big company names and or people that have signed on and show false paper work that “proves” the whole scam.
  4. Take investment money from others and, at the outset, pay a hefty return on profits. Do so from other moneys that you are receiving.
  5. Give a significant donation to the cause where a well-liked Rabbinic leader stands behind the institution and develop a relationship with him. You will need to use this relationship in order to attempt to influence him or others around him into helping defend you against those people who realize that you have stolen their money.  Articles in the Jewish media can be squashed.  This will also help you gain more people in which to obtain more money from.
The above, is not a cynical view of the world.  It is, unfortunately, a scenario that has been repeated numerous times.  It is more prevalent than it should be, in this author’s view, because people are almost entirely unaware of a Torah obligation that is incumbent upon all of us.”

PREVENTING PONZI SCHEMERS

Yes, there is a Torah obligation upon all of us to prevent the proliferation of Ponzi schemers and rip-offs within our community.  It is called the obligation to be “chas al mammon yisroel” – a fulfillment of the Torah Mitzvah of “v’ahavata larayacha kamocha.”

The Gemorah in Moed Katan 27b tells us that when Jews were burying their dead in the finest clothing, Rabban Gamliel HaZakain arose and declared that enough was enough. The rising pressures, the “keeping up with the Joneses” in how to dress the deceased was causing enormous economic pressure on the living. “It must stop,” declared the rabbi, and the tachrichim, burial shrouds, we now use became the norm.

To read the entire article click, here

CNO and Beechwood Re: The Platinum Zeroth’s Law and the Money that Isn’t Created Nor Destroyed, It Just Changes Hands

FINANCIAL ENTROPY, THE THERMODYNAMICS OF PLATINUM PARTNERS’ MONEY AND ZEROTH’S LAW AS IT APPLIES TO THE DIFFERENT STRATEGIES

[To be updated]

Dear Reader:

The notion of entropy in thermodynamics is chaos. The same is true, in very simplified terms, of financial entropy. Investors who manage to understand the chaos of a given set of financial principles are generally the ones who fare the best. Investors who can manipulate the entropy and maneuver it are magicians. Platinum Partners chief strategists were and have always been that, financial magicians. We give them credit.

Understanding how the pieces fit together is key to understanding the magnitude and complexity of the slight of hand of Platinums’ partners. It is like they were counting multiple decks in a casino and doing so flawlessly, until they weren’t.

Platinum Parterns’ connections to Beechwood Re and to CNO were integrally intertwined. Each one was intended to provide Platinum with a more diverse portfolio of investments, though CNO claims there was some distance between itself and Platinum, that Beechwood was an intermediary and they did not know the involvement. It is our contention that Beechwood Re was Platinum’s alter-ego. As to CNO, that is a bit less clear. 

Beechwood Re  was an extremely clever and somewhat macabre strategy for making money. It required that nursing home patients take out insurance policies written to the benefit of the nursing homes and then to die quickly.  The key, as we saw it at the time, was in knowing who would die and when. Sadly, the success of that strategy required the Platinum/Beechwood guys to get that information from someone in the nursing home business willing to either or both of convince the patients to sign over policies and to then share that information outside of the privacy considerations of the patients. We have a idea who it was, an odd connection to President Trump and someone he met in the 80’s and who had an integral understanding of long term care and the associated insurance. As to that story, that’s for another day. 

In 2014, Beechwood Re had obtained significant funding from CNO, a “reinsurer” who was providing insurance on the insurance policies held by Beechwood. The policies being written for CNO were “backstopping” the Beechwood policies. And the CNO policies, it would appear to have been long-term care policies and not necessarily life insurance.

CNO’s problem at the time was that it had underwritten numerous “long-term-care insurance” policies in the 1980’s and the payouts 25-30 years later were far higher than anticipated. In the best of circumstances, they would have made enough money with their own investment strategies on those policies over the 25-30 intervening years that they would not have been struggling. The calculations for an underwriter for long-term care insurance is based in part on actuarial tables and the health of the population. For CNO to have been a lucrative endeavor, they would have had to invest well and people would have needed to drop dead long before they utilized the policies. For the few who manage to live long enough to use the underlying policy for which they have paid a lifetime, the hope of the insurer is that the care required would be less than the money made during the intervening years. What policy underwriters at the time did not consider was the rising costs of healthcare, that people would live longer and spend more time in long term care.

For Beechwood, the relationship with CNO initially provided it with a reputable firm, the sharing of capital and resources and an underlying “good-will”. In addition, CNO had relationships with other banks and other underwriters, as did Beechwood (through the Platinum guys) and as such, the two entities could name drop for the purposes of working together and as a cost-benefit to one another. The two insurance strategies were slightly different. Whether or not CNO knew Beechwood was an arm of Platinum is unclear and in retrospect, they likely would have stuck with Beechwood regardless so long as the money was flowing.

Beechwood has argued that they were not and alter-ego of Platinum and actually they, too were the victims of a the fraud. That is not even a rational argument, particularly given the familial relationships involved. Beechwood was, to simplify the story,  a feeder fund for Platinum and one of its many investment vehicles or arbitrage funds, just an altogether different strategy. 

CNO on the other hand, may have been a victim of Platinum; but we believe it was also a victim of its own poor planning and greed. We also believed that even when they realized they were dealing with Platinum they made a choice to stay in the game. Platinum at the time was coining money. 

But then there’s “Black Elk”. The Black Elk investment strategy was oil. Black Elk had discovered a clever way to drill the remnants of other wells and obtain the smaller amounts of oil at the bottom of old wells. It is akin to trying to get the last drop of cola from a can. If you can figure out how to get all of the drops out of all of the cans and resell  the cola bottled differently, you can make money. That was the theory behind Black Elk. But no matter which way you play it, once the CEO was removed from his position, Black Elk was, in simple terms, another of Platinum’s feeder funds. 

The people involved were ultimately the same:  Moshe Mark Nordlicht, David Levy,  Moshe “Mark” Feuer, Jeffrey Shulse (who has argued his innocence) [https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-nordlicht-2] Josephe SanFilippo, Scott Taylor [https://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nysdce/1:2018cv12018/507059], Murray Huberfeld and a number of other Platinum Partners’ partners.

There are dozens of people whom we would argue should have been indicted, who were also original owners and/or initial investors in some of these strategies and were either family members or had previous relationships with the main funds’ players. How they have so far managed to remain outside the numerous indictments perplexes us.

Unfortunately for Platinums’ partners, we believe that the partners knew everything. There were no blind, deaf and dumb people playing in this game. There were no secrets amongst the men involved, just as there are no secrets the neighborhood where many of these men lived only blocks from one another. Many of these men were also related to one another, uncles, cousins, brothers. These were people who in large part had worked together before like Oceans 11 and were going to work together again like in Oceans 12 and 13. And, just like in the movies, they were extremely clever.

The strategies were hedged against one another. They could have gone on for years had a perfect storm of evens not occurred: Black Elk has an explosion on one of its rigs killing some of it’s employees, Beechwood being compelled to payout more than anticipated, and outside investors not deciding the funds’ returns were simply too high. 

Had Platinum Partners’ top brass not been so greedy, they would have succeeded in defrauding the financial systems. But, like Zeroth’s law of thermodynamics: “If two systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third system, they are in thermal equilibrium with each other.” Similarly, Black Elk was an alter-ego of Platinum Partners as was Beechwood Re. They were also an alter ego of one another. How CNO fits into this, it remains to be seen. We can’t discount he possibility that they were also in thermal equilibrium with Platinum.

Beechwood Re

Cayman Islands authorities to wind up Beechwood Re following fraud scandal

29th November 2018

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has approved a petition for the winding up of Beechwood Re, a locally domiciled reinsurer that is being sued for fraud in the U.S and has ties to the hedge fund Platinum Partners, which collapsed after a federal investigation last year. Grand Court Justice … Read the full article

Beechwood sold after reputation loss from Platinum Partners scandal

3rd August 2017

Beechwood, a group of reinsurance and asset management companies, has been sold in a last ditch attempt to salvage the firm instead of shutting it down after it suffered reputation loss when hedge fund Platinum Partners collapsed after a federal investigation, Reuters reported. Platinum’s top executives and founder were arrested … Read the full article

 

 

Beechwood Re To Close $590 Million Reinsurance Transaction

Beechwood Re, Ltd. to Reinsure In-Force Long-Term Care Liabilities of CNO Financial Group Subsidiaries


NEWS PROVIDED BY

Beechwood Re, Ltd. 

Feb 12, 2014, 09:56 ET

W YORKFeb. 12, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — Beechwood Re, Ltd., a life reinsurer, announced today that it had executed definitive documents to complete a reinsurance transaction with subsidiaries of CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO).

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140212/NY63663LOGO )

The deal will have CNO’s subsidiaries cede $550 million of statutory reserves and approximately $40 million of other capital associated with closed blocks of long-term care insurance underwritten by Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Company and Washington National Insurance Company.  The reinsurance transaction and associated structures have obtained all required regulatory approvals necessary to proceed.

“We are very pleased to have entered into this agreement with CNO,” said Beechwood Re CEO Mark Feuer.  “These transactions exemplify the creative reinsurance solutions that Beechwood Re has to offer.  We look forward to working with our new partner through a smooth transition and providing them with ongoing reinsurance support.”

Ed Bonach, CEO of CNO said, “Our reinsurance agreements represent a meaningful step forward in addressing our run-off business. We are pleased to have Beechwood Re as our partner in this transaction and look forward to a successful relationship moving forward.”

As a part of the transaction, Bankers Conseco and Washington National will transfer to Beechwood the in-force reserves and liabilities associated with the blocks of business.  The transactions are to be completed on a 100% coinsurance basis, with Beechwood holding reserves and required over-collateralization in trusts, with investment guidelines and periodic true-up provisions.

Fuzion Analytics, of Carmel, Indiana, will provide data analytics and coordination of Third Party Administration services on behalf of Beechwood Re to ensure best-in-class policyholder services following the transition.  Willis Re, a global reinsurance intermediary, was instrumental in the deal, led by Michael Kaster of their Life Solutions Group.

The transaction is expected to be fully consummated by the end of February.

About Beechwood Re, Ltd and Beechwood Bermuda International Ltd.

The Beechwood family of companies includes Beechwood Re, a reinsurer domiciled in Grand Cayman and regulated by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), and Beechwood Bermuda International Ltd., a licensed long-term insurer located in Hamilton, Bermuda and regulated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).  The companies were formed with the belief that there is a shortage in attractive capacity for the life markets, driven by a need for flexibility and creativity in underwriting the life and annuity reinsurance market associated with asset risk.  The Beechwood companies provide life and annuity reinsurance to primary insurance companies in the United States and Internationally.  Beechwood seeks to provide flexibility for companies to manage their balance sheets and risk profiles through a variety of solutions.  Target markets include reinsuring in-force blocks and ongoing quota-shares of fixed and indexed annuities, in addition to in-force, closed blocks of long-term care and long-term disability policies for primary writers.

More information is available by contacting Susan Sweetin, Media Relations at ssweetin@beechwoodreinsurance.comor (212) 260-5050 ext. 204

SOURCE Beechwood Re, Ltd.