Jeffrey Epstein, a Case of the Difference Between Justice for the Wealthy and Poor or Something More Nefarious…

Jeffrey Epstein and A Theory We Have Been Running:

Epstein was an Asset of the US Government, His Retreat a Stomping Ground for Diplomats and Wealthy and His Acosta-Negotiated Deal a Reward and… A Prisoner’s Dilemma 

The following is the full text of an article published by Matthew Taylor on 10 December 2018. We have not obtained permissions from the World Socialist Website www.wsws.org, or from Matthew Taylor, the author of the article; so we state in no uncertain terms that this is not intended to act as an endorsement by LM for WSW nor is it intended to allege that they have endorsed this site. 

In his article Taylor speaks of fundamental truths of the US justice system: there is one set of laws for the wealthy and a wholly different set for everyone else. We do not think he is wrong. His entire hypothesis is correct.

The US is a class system, the wealthy live by a wholly different set of rules, standards and judicial systems. Judges can be paid. Ethics, justice, humanity and fundamental fairness be damned when wealth is involved. Lawyers need not know how to navigate the law when they have money to play with and a judicial system for hire. We saw it with Platinum Partners (on a financial crimes basis), we will see it with Weinstein (another sexual predator) and we are seeing it with Epstein. 

Where Taylor falters, however, in our hypothesis is that we maintain there are intervening circumstances in the Epstein case. We don’t believe that he was just a “wealthy person” absent some unique talents and gifts. We do not necessarily attribute his wealth to his great escape from prosecution, at least not exclusively. Epstein, we contend, was a government asset. He is a science nut, a brilliant saboteur, extremely savvy and knows how to manipulate people and situations. He became very valuable, in our analysis, to the US government and with that came the enormity of his wealth, one begetting another.

Epstein’s Lolita Express was a person’s greatest fantasy and the island destination a place to entice negotiations. It is no coincidence that he owned a townhouse that once belonged the US State Department and it is no mere numbers game that the tail numbers of his planes were associated with the tail numbers of US government planes (or so we are told). The same Florida not-for-profit (for-profit) non-existent Florida Science Foundation entity paid for his legal fees and was financed by some of Wall Street’s finest and that, too, is not a game of chance.

Epstein, by our estimation, provided a playground for the rich and famous, diplomats and high level assets and in return he got immunity (or almost) by Acosta. The children abused in the process were throwaways for the elite; so they are of no consequence in the grand scheme of things, collateral damage.

The only piece we are not sure about is whether Epstein guaranteed his rightful place in the playbook of the unpunished by keeping a dossier on each of his guests, one that has not yet been published and will remain private so long as his legal winning streak continues. He was not afforded bail; but that may be a function of a judge who has scruples more than anything else. We will see.

For now, the following read on to Taylor’s take on things:

Jeffrey Epstein case exposes how US justice works for the rich

By Matthew Taylor
10 December 2018

The crimes and prosecution of billionaire money manager Jeffrey Epstein have received a great deal of attention in the past weeks from the news media. Most reports have centered upon the role of Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, who, in his previous role as the top federal prosecutor in Miami at the time of Epstein’s sentencing, had to sign off on the sweetheart deal he received.

Acosta claims the 13-month sentence Epstein received for two charges of soliciting prostitution was the harshest sentence that could be imposed, but reports from the Miami Herald and other sources have exposed this as a lie. Throughout the early 2000s, and probably earlier, Epstein sexually abused scores, perhaps hundreds of young girls, most of them between the ages of 13 and 16. He is also alleged to have engaged in human trafficking on a massive scale, pimping out his harem of desperate youth to his circle of financiers, politicians, and lawyers.

Throughout the investigation into his crimes, his prosecution, sentencing and jail term, and right up to the present day, Epstein has been aided by a pliant judiciary and multiple prosecutors who, because of his great wealth, treated him as though he were their client, rather than a serial sex offender. They helped Epstein and his legal team minimize public scrutiny of his case, worked diligently to substitute more serious charges with lesser ones, and ultimately violated federal law by failing to notify any of Epstein’s victims of the plea agreement reached.

The investigation and prosecution of Epstein have illustrated a fundamental fact of modern life: there are two justice systems, one for the rich, and one for everybody else.

Epstein started his career in New York decades ago, working as a derivatives specialist for Bear Stearns before founding his own investment firm. The full extent of his wealth is unknown, and the Miami Herald has noted that he has never been listed in the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans “largely because the magazine has never been able to determine the source or the size of his wealth.”

Though the exact figure is unknown, Epstein had the means to purchase, in addition to the Palm Beach mansion and private airliner where he committed many of his crimes, a private island in the Caribbean, a 10,000-acre ranch in New Mexico, and a Manhattan mansion that occupies an entire block of New York City real estate, the largest private residence in that city.

From 1999 to 2005, investigators in the Palm Beach area established that Epstein had set up a network whereby he would pay young girls, recruited from high schools and shopping malls, $200-$300 to give him “massages” at his mansion. Then he would pressure them into sexual acts. He would then offer them money to recruit other girls, essentially building what investigators labeled a “sexual Ponzi scheme.”

Typically Epstein and his network of “schedulers” would target poor working-class girls. His victims came from disadvantaged families, single-parent homes or foster care. Many of the girls were “one step away from homelessness,” according to the Herald. One victim, age 14 when she met Epstein, told the newspaper, “Jeffrey preyed on girls who were in a bad way, girls who were basically homeless. He went after girls who he thought no one would listen to and he was right.”

Throughout the course of their investigation, reporters “identified about 80 women who say they were molested or otherwise sexually abused by Epstein from 2001 to 2006.”

Palm Beach police opened an investigation of Epstein in 2005 after the parents of one of his victims reported his activities. Over the course of several months, investigators identified approximately 35 victims. Upon hearing about the investigation from one of the girls the police had interviewed, Epstein unleashed a multi-million-dollar counteroffensive, beginning with retaining the services of his longtime friend, the notorious right-wing lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

Dershowitz hired a team of private investigators to interview his client’s victims, dig up information he thought would discredit their stories, and intimidate them into keeping silent, sometimes by posing as police officers. He also met with Palm Beach County State’s Attorney Barry Krischer to discuss the case, after which both Krischer and lead prosecutor Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek began to obstruct the investigation.

After the State’s Attorney’s office refused to indict Epstein in 2006 on felony sex charges and instead referred his case to a grand jury that only heard testimony from two of his victims, Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter publicly accused his superiors of obstructing the investigation and the prosecutor’s office was forced to turn the investigation over to the FBI. Epstein was indicted on misdemeanor charges of soliciting prostitution.

After the federal investigation began Epstein, who was a longtime donor to the Democratic party and a personal friend of former president Bill Clinton, hired a small army of lawyers to represent him, most notably one-time Clinton special prosecutor Ken Starr.

Throughout the subsequent months, federal prosecutors worked hand in hand with Epstein’s team to assure the billionaire would spend a minimal amount of time in prison, and that his case would be kept out of the public eye.

Emails obtained by the Miami Herald detail this collaboration. In one, lead prosecutor A. Marie Villafana wrote to Epstein’s lawyers, “On an avoid the press note … I can file the charge in district court in Miami which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly. Do you want to check that out?”

In another email, Villafana details her efforts to minimize the charges against the man she was prosecuting: “I’ve been spending some quality time with Title 18 [the U.S. criminal code] looking for misdemeanors.” Throughout this period, prosecutors often communicated with Epstein’s attorneys via private emails, suggesting that they did not want public scrutiny of their negotiations.

After months of discussion, Epstein agreed to a plea deal whereby he would plead guilty to two state counts of soliciting prostitution and receive a 13-month sentence. In return, prosecutors agreed to shut down the investigation and grant immunity to Epstein’s co-conspirators, who were unnamed in the deal. Prosecutors also agreed to conceal the plea agreement from Epstein’s victims until after his sentencing, a violation of the federal Crime Victims Rights Act.

Included in the language of Epstein’s plea agreement was an acknowledgment by prosecutors that Epstein had provided assistance in an unrelated case. There was media speculation that it may be related to an investigation of two Bear Stearns executives whom Epstein testified against. Epstein had been a major investor in that company prior to its collapse and absorption by JP Morgan Chase at the beginning of the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

Epstein’s privileged status continued after his sentencing. He was allowed to serve his sentence in a private wing of the Palm Beach County jail, rather than be sent to prison where his status as a sex offender might place him in danger. He was also granted work release for six days a week, 12 hours a day, in spite of the fact that under Florida law sex offenders are barred from that program. He paid the sheriff’s deputies who guarded him and was generally given the VIP treatment by his jailers.

Upon his release, Epstein was to serve a year under house arrest. This he did, jetting back and forth between his mansions in New York and Palm Beach, with frequent excursions to his private island, all court-approved.

Epstein’s special treatment continued for years after he completed his sentence. In 2011 he tried to get his sex offender status reduced in the state of New York. The federal prosecutor assigned to the case argued on Epstein’s behalf, claiming that his victims had not cooperated in the case and that Epstein had never technically been indicted. The judge denied the petition expressing astonishment that a prosecutor would make such an argument.

Had Epstein not been a wealthy man, he would have surely served decades in prison for his crimes. Of course, were it not for his great wealth he would not have had the means to commit his crimes on such a vast scale to begin with. Because of the unique agreement he struck with prosecutors, the full extent of his sex trafficking network may never be known. It is only due to the exposé published by the Miami Herald, and the role of Trump’s current Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta in his plea agreement, that the Epstein case has come to public attention.

Epstein still has legal difficulties. Multiple lawsuits have been filed by his victims to overturn his plea agreement. Whatever the outcome of these lawsuits may be, they will not negate the central truth that has been once again been exposed: in the United States there are two sets of laws, one for the masses of people, and a different one altogether for the wealthy, where their privileged status protects them from the consequences of even the most heinous and repulsive actions.

 

 

3 thoughts on “Jeffrey Epstein, a Case of the Difference Between Justice for the Wealthy and Poor or Something More Nefarious…

      • We have looked for the Mossad connection and not found it. There is also no evidence that he associated with others who have or may have Mossad connections. His brand of connections don’t fit within the perceived Mossad MO. Entertaining dignitaries with child sexual favors is more characteristic of other regimes than of Israel-related matters. We just don’t see it. Saudi Arabia, however, is interesting moreso now because of Kashoggi.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.